Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to bond and compliance conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Akash Kumar, was arrested in connection with a Town Police Station case for alleged possession of 8.34 grams of a narcotic substance, contravening Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)B of the NDPS Act. He contended that the personal search was not conducted in accordance with statutory requirements, that the quantity seized was merely intermediate and far below commercial levels, and that he has a clean criminal record. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offence. The Court examined the facts, the procedural claim, and the petitioner’s willingness to cooperate, and concluded that bail could be granted with appropriate safeguards. Accordingly, the Court ordered regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of trial attendance and revocation if the petitioner reoffends.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDPS case involving a small quantity of narcotic substance.
  • Whether a failure to follow the prescribed personal search procedure under the NDPS Act warrants denial of bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedents and willingness to cooperate justify regular bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • small quantity
  • personal search procedure
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 8760 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-502 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI TOWN District- Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Akash Kumar S/o- Chamru Ram R/v- Fulwaia @ Phulwariya 01, W.No-9, Po-
                 Barauni Ps- Fulwaria @ Phulwariya Dist- Begusarai

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   21-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 502

                   of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8

                   (c) and 20 (b) (ii) B of N.D.P.S Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant-police

                   officer got information that two boys were wandering in the area

                   and were selling the smack in a co-operative market. Informant

                   with the other police personnels reached there and apprehended

                   two persons. The arrested persons were this petitioner and co-

                   accused Hammad Faisal. It is alleged that upon search of the

                   petitioner, total quantity of 8.34 gram of smack like substance

                   and some cash was recovered while from the possession of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 8760 of 2026(4) dt.21-04-2026
                                             2/3




          co-accused, 8.11 gm of smack like substance was recovered.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

          this case. It has been submitted that procedures as prescribed

          relating to personal search as provided in N.D.P.S act has not

          been followed. He further submits that charges have been

          framed in this case and petitioner is ready to co-operate in the

          trial and the quantity recovered is intermediary quantity much

          less than the commercial quantity and little more over the small

          quantity. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has

          clean criminal antecedent and is in custody since 03.12.2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record,

          considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties, let the

          petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-

          bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court

          Court of P.S.J., Begusrai in connection with Town P.S. Case No.

          502 of 2025, subject to the following condition:-

                       (i) It is directed that petitioner should co-operate in

          the trial and will be present on each and every fixed in the trial
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 8760 of 2026(4) dt.21-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                       and failure on two consecutive dates would entitle his bail to be

                       cancelled.

                                    (ii) If the petitioner gets involved himself in same and

                       similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution would be at

                       liberty to move an application for cancellation of his bail.

                                    7. The application stands allowed



                                                  (Praveen Kumar, J)
vashudha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.