Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioner is entitled to bail as there is no specific allegation against him and he has a clean antecedent, subject to prescribed conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Dinesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged assault on an informant’s family and charged under several IPC sections including 354(b), 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307 and 379. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, that the FIR contains only a generic allegation against all accused and that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution opposed bail, while the petitioner highlighted that co‑accused persons had already been granted anticipatory bail by the same court. The bench noted the absence of a specific allegation against the petitioner and his clean record, and consequently ordered his release on bail subject to conditions regarding cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence. The bail bond was set at Rs.10,000 with two sureties and further verification of antecedents was directed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the seriousness of the offences alleged under the IPC.
  • Whether the lack of a specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR justifies granting bail.
  • Whether the anticipatory bail granted to co‑accused persons influences the bail decision for the petitioner.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • anticipatory bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • assault
  • false implication
  • clean antecedent
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87673 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2024 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar S/O Rajendra Prasad Yadav @ Rajendra
                 Yadav Resident of Village- Chhotaki Kuhari, P.S.- Fatehpur, District- Gaya
                 (Bihar).

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP
                 For the Informant        :       Mr. Ujjawal Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                          :       Mr. Pankaj Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                      Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner, Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State as well as Mr. Ujjawal Kumar

                   Singh, learned counsel for the Informant.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   11.10.2025 in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No. 299 of

                   2024, F.I.R. dated 24.05.2024 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 354(B), 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307 & 379 of the

                   Indian Penal Code.

                               3. According to prosecution case, it is alleged that

                   petitioner along with other co-accused persons entered in the

                   house of the informant and started abusing and assaulted the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87673 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/4




          family members of the informant by means of lathi, rod and

          danda.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

          implicated in the present case. The allegation levelled against

          the petitioner is false and fabricated. Although the petitioner is

          named in the FIR but from bare perusal of the FIR it appears

          that there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act against

          him rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the

          accused persons including the petitioner and there is case and

          counter case between the parties and similarly situated co-

          accused persons, namely, Rajesh Kumar, Akhlesh Kumar @

          Akhilesh Yadav, Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav, Dinesh Yadav

          @ Dinesh Kumar have been granted the privilege of

          anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order

          dated 14.05.2025, 20.08.2025 and 28.11.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.

          6892 of 2025, Cr. Misc. No. 34598 of 2025 and Cr. Misc. No.

          78166 of 2025. He further submits that the police after

          investigation submitted the charge sheet and the petitioner is in

          custody since 11.10.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor and

          learned counsel for the Informant have vehemently opposed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87673 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            3/4




          prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          petitioner has clean antecedent and there is no specific

          allegation of assault or overt act against him and similarly

          situated co-accused persons have been granted the privilege of

          anticipatory bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let the

          petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

          Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Gaya in connection with Fatehpur

          P.S. Case No. 299 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

          any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87673 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                        4/4




                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.