Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh Roy @ Santosh Kumar Roy @ Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond and specified conditions.

Summary

Santosh Roy was arrested on 25‑08‑2025 in connection with a kidnapping case (PS‑Dagarua Case No. 292 of 2025) under Sections 137(2), 140(1) and 3(5) of the BNS. The informant, the father of the alleged victim, claimed his 16‑year‑old daughter was abducted and that Roy’s mobile was switched off, suggesting a threat to her life. Roy’s counsel argued that the FIR is fabricated, that Roy and the girl were lawfully married on 22‑08‑2025, and that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS does not support the prosecution’s case. The prosecution opposed bail, but the court noted the victim was living with Roy as his wife and that there was no evidence of concealment of criminal antecedents. Accordingly, the court granted bail on a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties and imposed conditions regarding cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in offences under Sections 137(2), 140(1) and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the FIR alleging kidnapping is fabricated and the marriage of the accused to the alleged victim negates the charge.
  • Whether the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the BNSS affects the bail decision.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 137(2), 140(1), 3(5)
  • BNSS — s. 183

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • marriage
  • fabricated FIR
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • POCSO
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87863 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-292 Year-2025 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Roy @ Santosh Kumar Roy @ Santosh Kumar S/O Dinesh Roy R/O
                 Village- Gogar Pani Tanki, P.S- Dagarua, Distt.- Purnea.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    A W/O B, D/O X R/O Village- Gogar Pani Tanki, P.S- Dagarua, Distt.-
                 Purnea.
           3.    X S/O Y R/O Village- Nikh Rail Ward No.-15, P.S- Dagarua, Dist.- Purnea.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
                 For the informant        :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   30-03-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   25.08.2025 in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 292 of

                   2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2), 140(1)

                   and 3(5) of BNS.

                               3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant

                   filed an application before S.HO. Dagarua Police Station stating

                   therein that on 14.08.2025 at about 3.30 A.M. his minor

                   daughter aged about 16 years disappear from his house. He
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87863 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/4




          made a search about his daughter. During course of search, he

          came to know that FIR named accused persons including this

          petitioner have kidnapped his daughter and kept her in some

          unknown place. It is next alleged that when he made call on the

          mobile of Santosh Roy it was switched off. He has suspicion

          that they will kill his daughter or commit any untoward incident

          with his daughter.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and the allegation as alleged in

          the FIR is forged and fabricated and the petitioner has not

          committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel

          for the petitioner submits that, in fact, the petitioner was in love

          with the victim girl and both have performed marriage on

          22.08.2025 at Puran Devi Temple, Purnea and the OP No. 2 has

          filed a petition dated 08.09.2025 before the Judicial Magistrate,

          1st Class, Purnea stating therein that she has performed the

          marriage with the petitioner. Apart from aforesaid, the victim in

          her statement recorded under Section 183 of BNSS has not

          supported the case of the prosecution. Learned counsel for the

          petitioner further submits that the victim is presently living as a

          wife in the house of the petitioner with full dignity and honour.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87863 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                            3/4




          State and learned counsel for the informant, on the other hand,

          have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

          Learned counsel for the informant fairly submits that she is

          living in the house of the petitioner as his wife with full honour

          and dignity.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances,

          let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional

          Sessions Judge VII-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Purnea in

          connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 292 of 2025, subject to

          the following conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.

                       ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

          move for cancellation of bail.

                       iii. And further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87863 of 2025(3) dt.30-03-2026
                                                       4/4




                     any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.