Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Brijesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and conditions, as the evidence did not substantiate his alleged participation in the offences.

Summary

The petitioner, Brijesh Yadav, was implicated in a case arising from a liquor‑related raid on 07‑09‑2025 where police and Home Guards were attacked by a mob. The prosecution alleged that Yadav participated in assaulting police personnel, damaging a police vehicle and seizing a mobile phone, invoking several offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. Yadav contended that he was merely a by‑stander, that the FIR was based on vague allegations, and that the CCTV footage showed him not involved in the violence. The court examined the CCTV evidence, the injury report indicating only minor injuries, and noted that Yadav was already on bail in three other cases. Considering these facts, the court held that bail could be granted under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. Act, subject to a bond and conditions. The bail order also directed verification of Yadav’s criminal antecedents and cancellation of the bond if concealment is found. Consequently, the petition for bail was allowed and the matter was disposed in favour of the petitioner.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure in view of the allegations under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023.
  • Whether the evidence, including CCTV footage, establishes the petitioner’s participation in the alleged offences.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNS Act
  • CCTV evidence
  • alleged assault on police
  • liquor prohibition raid
  • criminal antecedent verification

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88063 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Brijesh Yadav Son of Narayan Yadav Resident of Village- Dhanaha Gadiyani
                 Tola, P.S.- Dhanaha, District- West Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ramendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate
                                          :      Mr. Shahbaj Allam, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-02-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                    2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2),

                   191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303 and 324 of BNS, 2023.

                                    3.    The prosecution case, in brief, is that on

                   07.09.2025 he was checking vehicles at the Bansi Excise

                   Prohibition Check Post along with his subordinate Home

                   Guards. During the checking, he received a tip-off that some

                   people were carrying liquor at Devipur Chowk and were

                   creating a ruckus after drinking. On receiving information he

                   along with the Home Guards deputed at the Bansi Check Post

                   reached at the place of occurrence Devipur Chowk and saw
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88063 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/4




          some bike riders parking their bike and making a loud

          commotion. While the police were questioning them, a strong

          smell of alcohol emanated from their breath. It is next alleged

          that three of them, who had consumed alcohol, were put into the

          police vehicle, and their two motorcycles and one mobile phone

          were confiscated. After a short distance, miscreants from

          behind, chasing the department vehicle in cars and motorcycles,

          blocked the path of the vehicle near the Kathar Petrol Pump. In

          the process, a motorcyclist lost his balance and fell on the

          roadside. Shortly after, some bike riders also gathered there

          armed with sharp weapons, attacked the raiding party with

          intent to kill. A scuffle ensued, and the three drunk individuals

          were forcibly freed from the police vehicle. Home Guard and

          informant were severely injured. The police vehicle was also

          damaged and informant's mobile phone was snatched by the

          miscreants. The informant and other injured police personnel,

          with the help of Excise S.H.O., Bagaha and the local P.S.

          S.H.O., Dhanaha somehow managed to escape and were taken

          for treatment. The miscreants were identified through video

          footage, which include 1. Naresh Kushwaha, 2. Brijesh Yadav

          and other 15-20 unknown persons. On the basis of application

          of informant, present case was registered.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88063 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            3/4




                           4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has three criminal antecedents. It is next submitted

          that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case

          based on general and omnibus allegation. It is next submitted

          that the no occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken

          place as far as the petitioner is concerned. It is next submitted

          that from perusal of the FIR it appears that petitioner was not at

          all involved in the alleged crime rather upon seeing scuffle,

          petitioner become bystander.

                           5. The application is opposed by the learned APP

          for the State.

                         6. Considering the fact that although there is

          allegation against the petitioner of having attacked police

          personnel and damaged police vehicle, in the CCTV footage the

          picture of petitioner has been captured as a bystander and also

          the injury sustained is simple in nature as per the injury report.

          Further, taking into account that the petitioner is on bail in the

          three criminal cases, details of which have been stated in

          paragraph-3 of the bail application. Under these facts and

          circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

          weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88063 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                                       4/4




                     10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate,

                     1st Class, Bagaha in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 296

                     of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438

                     (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482 (2) of the

                     B.N.S.S., 2023 and subject to the further condition that:-

                                  (i)    the     petitioner      shall    co-operate   in   the

                     investigation/trial.

                                  (ii) the learned Court would, however, verify the

                     criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case it is found that

                     the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the Court

                     below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                     petitioner. However, it is expected that the verification process

                     would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                               (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.