Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh @ BabaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail on furnishing the prescribed bond and sureties, subject to conditions, as the seized quantity is small and he was not present during the search.

Summary

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Singh, applied for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 20.90 grams of heroin. He claimed innocence, stating that he was already in custody for a different case when his shop was searched, and that the seized quantity was far below commercial levels. The State opposed the bail, but the court considered the small quantity, the petitioner’s custody at the time of the search, and the principle of bail under the NDPS Act. The court ordered the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount and imposed conditions of cooperation and verification of criminal antecedents. Upon compliance, the petitioner was to be released on bail.

Issues considered

  • Whether a person accused under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act is entitled to regular bail when the alleged quantity is small.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior custody for a separate case affects his eligibility for bail in the present NDPS case.
  • Whether the quantity of heroin seized constitutes a 'commercial quantity' warranting denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • NDPS Act
  • regular bail
  • small quantity
  • heroin possession
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • bail conditions
  • commercial quantity

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88136 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1203 Year-2025 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Kumar Singh @ Anil Singh @ Baba S/o Vishundeo Prasad @
                 Vishundeo Prasad Singh R/o Village - Bhagmusha, P.S - Hajipur Town,
                 District – Vaishali                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar                                  ... ... Opposite
                 Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Shabina Talat
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Anish Chandra
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   02-02-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well

                   as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection

                   with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1203 of 2025, registered for

                   the offences punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the NDPS

                   Act, 1985.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is that during a

                   police search of his shop, namely Laxmi General Store at

                   Anjanpir       Chowk,        50     small      containers       of     suspected

                   heroin/smack, weighing about 20.90 grams, were allegedly

                   recovered and seized by the police.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

                   this case. As a matter of fact, on the same day, in another

                   occurrence of Marpet, the petitioner was in custody in Hajipur

                   Nagar P.S. Case No. 1202 of 2025, in whose absence his shop

                   was searched. He has further submitted that the quantity of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88136 of 2025(3) dt.02-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     smack is much less than the commercial quantity. The petitioner

                     has been in custody since 17.10.2025.

                                  5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has

                     opposed the prayer for bail.

                                  6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to

                     furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release

                     the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

                     with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

                     learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Vaishali at

                     Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1203 of

                     2025, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner

                     shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself

                     available as and when required by the court.

                                  7. Before accepting the bail bond, the criminal

                     antecedent of the petitioner shall be verified and if, it is

                     found that he is involved in any other case except the case(s),

                     mentioned in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition, his bail

                     bond shall be cancelled.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Nirmal/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.