Patna High Court
Vinay Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was denied to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Vinay Kumar Singh, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. for alleged theft of a motorcycle. He claimed he was falsely implicated and highlighted his thirteen prior criminal records, while also stating he had been in custody since June 21, 2025. The prosecution opposed bail, asserting that the petitioner had made a self‑inculpatory statement accepting guilt. The court considered the seriousness of the allegations, the petitioner’s extensive criminal antecedents, and the admission of guilt, and concluded that bail could not be granted. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given his criminal antecedents and self‑inculpatory statement under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 309(4)
Subjects
- bail
- criminal antecedents
- self‑inculpatory statement
- false implication
- Section 309(4) B.N.S.
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88178 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2025 Thana- AANDAR District- Siwan
======================================================
Vinay Kumar Singh son of Jitendra Singh Village -Belahi PS -Andar District
-Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Andar
P.S. Case No. 134/2025 registered for the offences punishable
under Section 309(4) of B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown
criminals are said to have committed loot of the motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
counsel further submits that he has thirteen criminal antecedents
and he is in custody since 21.06.2025. The petitioner undertakes
to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88178 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026
2/2
has accepted his guilt in his self-inculpatory statement.
6. Considering allegation levelled against the
petitioner and the criminal antecedents, this Court is not inclined
to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…