Patna High Court
Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The bail application was dismissed because the Court was not inclined to grant bail in view of the serious nature of the allegations.
Summary
Randhir Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a rape case registered as PS Desari Case No. 334 of 2025, alleged under Sections 70(1), 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioner applied for bail, having been in custody since 12 September 2025. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner committed rape. The Court examined the seriousness of the allegations and the fact that the petitioner had been detained for several months. Considering the gravity of the offence, the Court was not inclined to grant bail and dismissed the bail application.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate decision on the bail application of the accused in a rape case under Sections 70(1), 140(3) and 3(5) of the BNS?
Legislation cited
- BNS — s. 140(3), 3(5), 70(1)
Subjects
- bail
- rape
- serious offence
- criminal procedure
- custody
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88284 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2025 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali
======================================================
Randhir Kumar @ Randhir Kumar Singh S/O Subhash Singh R/O Village -
Baliya, P.S.- Sahdei, (Desari), District- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 19-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection Desari P.S.
Case No. 334 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections
70(1), 140(3), 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is
accused of committing rape with the victim.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025.
5. Considering the serious allegations levelled against
the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the
petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.