Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raghunandan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to surrender and seek regular bail before the lower court.

Summary

The petitioner, Raghunandan Yadav, was involved in a criminal case (PS Case No.348, 2009) and filed an application seeking regular bail. He later requested permission to withdraw that application, surrender within four weeks, and subsequently apply for regular bail before the lower court. The Hon'ble Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma granted the request, allowing the withdrawal and directing that the surrender and bail application be considered on its merits on the same day. The court dismissed the original bail application as withdrawn, ensuring the petitioner would not be prejudiced by the order. The matter was left for disposal by the lower court upon surrender and fresh bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw his bail application and surrender before the lower court
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to seek regular bail after surrender

Subjects

  • bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • surrender
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88329 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-348 Year-2009 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District-
                                                        Begusarai
                 ======================================================
                 Raghunandan Yadav Son of Mathura Yadav Resident of Village - Chopnadih,
                 P.S.- Markacho, District - Kodarma (Jharkhand).

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Vinod Gautam, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-01-2026                  Heard Mr. Vinod Gautam, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the application with

                   liberty to the petitioner to surrender before the learned Court

                   below within a period of four weeks from today and seeks

                   regular bail.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. The application is dismissed as withdrawn with the

                   liberty that the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail

                   before the learned Court below, the same shall be considered

                   and disposed of on the same day, on its own merit, in
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88329 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      accordance with law and without being prejudiced by any

                      observation in the present order.


                                                     (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.