Patna High Court
Lalan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC.
Summary
Lalan Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a police case (Case No. 401 of 2024) involving offences under the Bihar National Security Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that a large group, led by Anil Sharma, was forcibly constructing a house on disputed land and attacked police personnel, seizing a service pistol. The petitioner contended that the FIR does not specifically allege any wrongdoing on his part and that he is one of many named persons, pointing out that a co‑accused, Pankaj Kumar, had earlier been granted anticipatory bail by the same court. The State opposed bail, noting that the petitioner is named in the FIR and has a prior criminal antecedent, although he is already out on bail in another matter. Considering the lack of specific allegation against the petitioner and the precedent of bail to the co‑accused, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a cash bond, two sureties and conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite being named in the FIR and having a prior criminal antecedent.
Legislation cited
- Bihar National Security Act, 2023 — s. 115(2), 121(2), 126(2), 127(2), 324(4), 324(5), 3(5), 351(2), 352
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Section 438 CrPC
- Bihar National Security Act
- FIR
- false implication
- criminal antecedent
- police assault
- disputed land
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88354 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2024 Thana- BELDOUR District- Khagaria
======================================================
Lalan Sharma Son of Vakil Sharma Resident Of Village -Gwas Tiwari Basa,
Ps -Beldaur, Dist- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 09-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, learned Additional
Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in
connection with Beldaur P.S. Case No. 401 of 2024, F.I.R. dated
19.11.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),
127(2), 115(2), 324(4), 324(5), 121(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of
the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, one Anil Sharma is
forcibly building a house on a disputed land with the help of
about 100 anti-social elements. When the informant along with
other police personnel reached there and restrained them from
doing so then these anti-social elements attacked on the police
personnel and also damaged their vehicle and snatched their
service pistol.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88354 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
2/3
petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the
present case. From perusal of the F.I.R it appears that there is no
specific allegation attributed against the petitioner. In fact, the
F.I.R has been lodged against 100 persons including this
petitioner. He further submits that the similarly situated co-
accused, namely, Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sharma has been
granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order
dated 22.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33585 of 2025.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has
vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R and apart from
that the petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the
present one but fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in the
pending matter.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and the
co-accused person has been granted anticipatory bail by this
Court, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest
or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty
days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88354 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
3/3
J.M. 1st Class, Khagaria in connection with Beldaur P.S. Case
No. 401 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with
other following conditions:-
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and
on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall
verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at
any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for
cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the
acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order
shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of
verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.