Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bablu Ray @ Bablu Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was not granted and the application was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners, Bablu Ray and Mohan Ray, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with Darbhanga Town Police Station Case No. 125 of 2025, which is registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners assaulted the victim. The petitioners claim they are innocent and have been falsely implicated, though they possess six prior criminal antecedents. The State opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The Court, considering the seriousness of the allegations and the petitioners' criminal record, declined to grant anticipatory bail and dismissed the application, directing the petitioners to surrender within two weeks for regular bail proceedings.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under the listed sections of the B.N.S. given their criminal antecedents

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 303(2), 324(1), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 76

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal antecedents
  • bail application
  • B.N.S. sections
  • Darbhanga
  • High Court of Patna

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88511 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
           1.     Bablu Ray @ Bablu Kumar Ray S/O Ram Sevak Ray @ Kallor Ray @
                  Kallar Ray Resident of Village/ Mohalla- Shubhankarpur, P.S- Darbhanga
                  Town, District- Darbhanga.
           2.    Mohan Ray S/O Ram Sevak Ray @ Kallor Ray Resident of Village/
                 Mohalla- Shubhankarpur, P.S- Darbhanga Town, District- Darbhanga.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai,APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection

                   with Darbhanga Town P.S. Case No. 125 of 2025 instituted

                   under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 324(1),

                   351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case,               petitioners are

                   alleged to have assaulted the victim.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

                   this case. Petitioners have six criminal antecedents.

                                5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88511 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                          2/2




                        anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                                     6. Considering the allegations levelled against the

                        petitioner and the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, I am

                        not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

                                     7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

                                     8. The petitioners are directed to surrender within two

                        weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the

                        Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga will take all steps

                        for arrest of the petitioners.

                                     9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                        Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga through FAX or e-

                        mail for its compliance.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.