Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

PAMMY DEVI @ PAMMY CHAUBEYversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, holding that the dispute is primarily civil and the petitioner is of clean antecedent.

Summary

Pammy Devi, the petitioner, was arrested in a complaint case alleging forgery and cheating under Sections 467, 468 and 34 of the IPC related to a land dispute. She contended that she was the bona‑fide purchaser of the land, that the matter was essentially a civil family dispute, and that she had a clean antecedent. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed her bail. The court observed that the dispute appeared primarily civil and that the petitioner was of good character. Accordingly, the court ordered her release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The bail order was to be executed within four weeks of the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving alleged forgery and cheating under the IPC.
  • Whether the underlying dispute is civil in nature, warranting bail under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • forgery
  • cheating
  • civil dispute
  • criminal procedure
  • IPC
  • CrPC

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88527 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-847 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                         Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Pammy Devi @ Pammy Chaubey, W/o Arjesh Kumar Chaubey, resident of
                 village-Dehri P.S.- Buxar Muffasil, Dist- Buxar, At present Jail Road Gayatri
                 Nagar Buxar, P.S.- Buxar Town, Dist- Buxar
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Chanchala Devi, W/o Bipin Bihari Diwedi, R/o Sohani Patti, P.S.- Buxar
                  Town, Dist- Buxar.
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Parties
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   11-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf

                   of the petitioner and learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

                                2. The accused/petitioner apprehending

                   her arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.

                   847(c) of 2021, in which cognizance has been

                   taken for the offences punishable under Sections

                   467 and 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is

                   to cheat informant by creating forged document

                   related with plot no. 389 of Mauza Pandeypatti,

                   P.S.-Buxar Town, District -Buxar.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88527 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the

          purchaser of the land in issue after paying

          consideration amount. It is pointed out that the

          petitioner herself is the victim of circumstance. It is

          pointed out that out of family dispute with cousin

          brother, the petitioner was implicated with present

          case by informant without having no occasion.

          While concluding argument, it is submitted that the

          dispute is purely civil in nature, for which the

          present           criminal              case         was     completely

          unoccasioned. Petitioner is said to be a lady of

          clean antecedent.

                       5.         Learned APP opposed the prayer of

          bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and

          circumstances and by taking note of fact as the

          dispute primarily appears civil in nature, where

          petitioner         is     a     man        of        clean   antecedent,

          accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event

          of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial

          Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is

          directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88527 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                     of the learned J.M.-1st Class, Court No.4 at

                     Buxar/concerned Court, where the case is pending

                     in connection with Complaint Case No. 847(c) of

                     2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                     Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS.


                                                        (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)
    Sanjeet/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.