Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shivam RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Shivam Ranjan was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c)/21(c), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act after 360 bottles of cough syrup containing 0.2% codeine were seized from a vehicle he was travelling in. The petitioner contended that he was merely a passenger, that only a mobile phone was found on him, and that the syrup fell within the exemption for manufactured drugs under Notification S.O. 826(E) because the codeine concentration was below 2.5%. The State argued, relying on Hira Singh v. Union of India, that any non‑toxic material mixed with a contraband makes the whole quantity a commercial quantity of narcotic drug. The Court noted that under Section 2(d) of the NDPS Act the drug itself is not a narcotic drug and that the Central Government can issue notifications, and consequently found no jurisdictional impediment to granting bail. The Court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the cough syrup containing 0.2% codeine is exempt from NDPS provisions under Notification S.O. 826(E).
  • Whether the seized quantity constitutes a 'commercial quantity' under the NDPS Act.
  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the alleged possession of contraband.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • codeine
  • manufactured drug exemption
  • commercial quantity
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88568 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-887 Year-2025 Thana- RAMKRISHNANAGAR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Shivam Ranjan S/O Sanjay Srivastav Resident of Village - Purab Bazar, Ward
                 No.- 30, P.S- Saharsa, District - Saharsa

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :     Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :     Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   30-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 887 of 2025 registered

                   for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c)/21(c), 25 and 29

                   of the N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that from the white

                   colour scorpio vehicle, altogether 360 bottles each of 100 ml

                   wiscof cough syrup containing codeine was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. The petitioner has been falsely

                   implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern in any

                   way with the alleged contraband rather he is standing nearby
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88568 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2026
                                            2/3




          and from his possession only a mobile was recovered. Petitioner

          is only the passenger in the said vehicle. Moreover, they are

          languishing in judicial custody since 18.10.2025.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that Under Notification No. S.O. 826(E) dated 14.11.1985 under

          the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Rules,

          1985 that preparations are exempted as manufactured drugs

          provided the preparations contained the narcotic drugs to the

          extent permitted in respect of codeine under Entry No. 35. It is

          stated that codeine and ethyle morphine and their salts including

          dionine all dilutions and preparations are considered to be

          manufactured drugs except those which are compounded with

          one or more other ingredients and containing not more than 100

          miligrams of the drugs per doses unit and with a concentration

          of not more than 2.5 % in undivided preparations and which

          have been established in therapeutic practice.

                       6. In this case, wiscof cough Syrup has been

          recovered and the concentration of the codeine in this drug is

          approximately 0.2% which is less than 2.5% as provided in the

          above notification.

                       7. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

          the application for bail and has submitted that in the case of Hira

          Singh and Anr. V. Union of India and Anr., the Hon’ble Supreme
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88568 of 2025(3) dt.30-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Court has held that entire non-toxic material which is mixed with the

                     contraband will be considered as the contraband and as such, the

                     quantity which has been recovered from the possession of the

                     petitioner is commercial quantity.

                                  8. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that in view of

                     Section 2(d) of the N.D.P.S. Act, the drug itself is not narcotic

                     drug then there is no jurisdictional basis for the case and the

                     Court would not have a reason to go into the question of

                     quantities. The Central Government has power to issue

                     notification time to time.

                                  9. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Sessions Judge/Special Judge(NDPS), Patna in connection with

                     Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case No. 887 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.