Patna High Court
Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Kumar MandalversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was denied because the trial was near completion and the offences were of a serious nature.
Summary
Rajendra Kumar (also known as Rajendra Kumar Mandal) was charged under Sections 302, 201, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly killing a victim by firing at her. He has been in custody since 31‑05‑2023 and the trial judge indicated that the trial is close to completion. The petitioner applied for bail, arguing that the trial is nearly over. The Court, noting the seriousness of the offences and the imminent conclusion of the trial, was not inclined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with murder and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act when the trial is on the verge of completion
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(1-b)a, 26, 27
- Indian Penal Code — s. 120(b), 201, 302
Subjects
- bail
- murder
- IPC
- Arms Act
- criminal procedure
- trial completion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88578 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2023 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
Rajendra Kumar @ Rajendra Kumar Mandal Son of Baleshwar Mandal R/o
Village - Arma, P.S. - Karja, Distt. - Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar
Mr.Abhishek Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 24-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kajra
P.S. Case No. 73 of 2023 registered for the offence under
Sections 302, 201, 120(b) of the Indian Penal Code and under
Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to
have killed the victim by firing at her.
4. The petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2023 and
from the report of the trial Judge, it appears that the trial of the
case is on the verge of completion.
5. In view of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined
to grant bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…