Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bacha Lal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding that the allegations against him were not substantiated and that he was entitled to liberty pending trial.

Summary

Bacha Lal Kumar was arrested in connection with a human‑trafficking case (Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No.161 of 2025) alleging violations of Section 143(6) of the B.N.S., Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 3 and 14 of the Child Adolescent Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act. The prosecution claimed the accused were transporting children to Bangalore for work, while the petitioner contended he was merely waiting on the platform and was falsely implicated, with the primary allegations against co‑accused Kush Kumar and Shrawan Kumar Yadav. He had no prior criminal record and had been in judicial custody since 15 July 2025. The State opposed bail, but the court, after hearing both sides and considering the circumstances, decided to grant bail. The petitioner was ordered to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, subject to the satisfaction of the ADJ‑XVI, Muzaffarpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the B.N.S., Juvenile Justice Act and Child Adolescent Labour Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • human trafficking
  • child labour
  • criminal procedure
  • presumption of innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88631 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2025 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR RAIL P.S. District-
                                                          Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Bacha Lal Kumar, S/o Ram Janam Sahani, R/o Village- Bada Mangru, Ward
                 No. 12, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No.161 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 143(6) of B.N.S., Section 79 of

                   J.J. Act and Sections 3/14 of Child Adolescent Labour (Prohibition

                   & Regulation) Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police

                   had information about human trafficking. On this information,

                   police reached the railway platform and found some feared

                   children seated on a train. On inquiry, they identified the accused

                   persons who were taking the children to Bangalore for work in

                   different shop.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88631 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case merely on

                       suspicion. He was sitting on the platform as he has to board on a

                       train. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the F.I.R.

                       itself it is clear that when the children were asked, they told that

                       Kush Kumar and Shrawan Kumar Yadav were carrying them to

                       Howrah for the packaging work. It has further been submitted that

                       the main thrust of allegation is against the co-accused Kush Kumar

                       and Shrawan Kumar Yadav. Petitioner is having no criminal

                       antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since

                       15.07.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                       opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                       of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-XVI,

                       Muzaffarpur in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case

                       No.161 of 2025.


                                                       (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.