Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Baitha @ Pawan Kumar BaithaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The modification of the anticipatory bail order is allowed, granting the petitioner four weeks to surrender and directing the trial court to accept his bail bond with the same conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Pawan Baitha was granted anticipatory bail on 13‑08‑2025 with a condition that he must reunite with his wife, Krinta Devi, and live with her in the matrimonial home, supported by an affidavit from her. After attempting to comply, the wife refused to cohabit, and her father also declined. The petitioner filed an application seeking modification of the bail order to remove the cohabitation condition. The court examined whether the condition could be altered given the wife's unwillingness and held that the modification could be permitted. It granted the petitioner four weeks to surrender before the trial court, directing the trial court to accept his bail bond with the original conditions except the cohabitation requirement.

Issues considered

  • Whether the anticipatory bail order can be modified to remove the condition of the petitioner living with his wife
  • Whether the court can grant additional time for surrender in view of the wife's refusal

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • modification
  • bail conditions
  • marital dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88674 of 2025
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32431 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2024 Thana- SIWAN COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                          Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Pawan Baitha @ Pawan Kumar Baitha S/o- Late Bhola Baitha Resident Of
                 Village- Sahlaur, Ps- Sahayak Sarai, Siwan, Dist- Siwan
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     Krinta Devi W/o- Pawan Baitha @ Pawan Kumar Baitha, D/o- Shyama Ji
                  Baitha R/v- Nauranga, Ps- G.B Nagar Dist- Siwan
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   25-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The present application has been filed for

                   modification in order dated 13.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc.

                   No.32431 of 2025.

                                3. Counsel submits that by virtue of the said order, the

                   petitioner was granted anticipatory bail with direction to

                   surrender before the Court within eight weeks with specific

                   direction that prior to furnishing bail bond, the petitioner shall

                   visit the house of his wife i.e., O.P. No.2 and will take her with

                   him in the matrimonial house and live with her with full dignity

                   and love. The Trial Court shall accept the bail bonds of the

                   petitioner on furnishing an affidavit by the wife (O.P. No.2) of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88674 of 2025(7) dt.25-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the petitioner to the effect that she is residing with the petitioner

                     with full honour and dignity. He further submits that the said

                     order was passed on 13.08.2025, thereafter, the petitioner had

                     visited to the house of O.P. No.2 and request her father that he

                     has come to brought his wife, but they were not ready. In this

                     regard, two certificates were issued. One from Mukhiya and

                     another from Surpanch dated 25.09.2025.

                                  4. Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 submits that the

                     situation between the parties reached up to that extend that wife

                     is not interested to live with the petitioner.

                                  5. In the light of the submissions mentioned in the

                     petition, let the said modification is hereby allowed and further

                     four weeks’ time is hereby granted from today to surrender

                     himself before the Court below and the Trial Court is directed to

                     accept his bail bond with the same conditions.

                                  6. Accordingly, the modification application is hereby

                     allowed upto the extent.



                                                              (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Prakashmani/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.