Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jai Nandan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners – Jai Nandan Singh, his son Pramod Kumar, grandson Prince Kumar and local resident Chotu Kumar – applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a Danapur police case (No. 841 of 2025) that alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, including assault and related crimes. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners had assaulted the victim causing simple injury, while the petitioners contended they were innocent, noting familial ties to the informant and that mutual fights had occurred between the parties. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, after considering the facts, relationships between the parties and the nature of the allegations, exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the BNSS and granted anticipatory bail. The order directed each petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions prescribed by the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the alleged offences warrant denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 482
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88726 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-841 Year-2025 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Jai Nandan Singh S/O Late Jamadar Rai Resident of village- New Tarachak,
                  P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna
           2.    Pramod Kumar S/O Sri Jai Nandan Singh Resident of village- New
                 Tarachak, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna
           3.    Prince Kumar @ Pince Kumar S/O Jai Nandan Singh Resident of village-
                 New Tarachak, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna
           4.    Chotu Kumar @ Yuvraj Kumar S/O Ram Kumar @ Ram Kumar Rai
                 Resident of village- Doli Sakra, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Patna

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Abhay Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned counsel for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with

                   Danapur P.S. Case No. 841 of 2025 registered for offences

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 74, 351(2), 352,

                   3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are

                   accused of assaulting the victim causing simple injury.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88726 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      offence. He further submits that the petitioner no. 1 is the

                      brother of the informant and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are the son

                      of the petitioner no. 1 and the petitioner no. 4 is a local resident.

                      There has been fights between the parties and both side

                      assaulted each other.

                                   5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                      the prayer for bail.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case and the relationship between the parties, this

                      application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

                                   7. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in

                      the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from

                      today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail

                      bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned

                      A.C.J.M.-1, Danapur/concerned court below in connection with

                      Danapur P.S. Case No. 841 of 2025 subject to the conditions as

                      laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.