Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tabrej @ TabrezversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Tabrej @ Tabrez, was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act after police recovered about 90 grams of a smokable narcotic from a rented house. The petitioner contended that he was not the tenant, had no possession of the seized material, and was falsely implicated, also alleging that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.S.) Act during the seizure. He further argued that the quantity seized, while more than a small amount, was far below a commercial quantity and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 14‑10‑2025. The State opposed bail, but the Court, after hearing both sides, considered the procedural lapse, the modest quantum of the drug, and the petitioner’s clean antecedent. Consequently, the Court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to an accused under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the failure to comply with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. Act during seizure affects bail eligibility.
  • Whether the quantum of narcotic (90 grams) qualifies as a ‘small quantity’ or a ‘commercial quantity’ for bail considerations.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug seizure
  • Section 105
  • quantum of contraband
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88810 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-189 Year-2025 Thana- R S P.S. District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Tabrej @ Tabrez, S/o- Altaf @ Iltaf, Resident of Village- Lahna Gosaibari,
                 Ward No.- 15, P.S. and District- Araria

                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Ranjeet Choubey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Anil Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with R.S. P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of N.D.P.S. Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a

                   rented house, altogether 90 gram of smack like object was

                   recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. He is not the tenant in that house. It has further been

                   submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession.

                   The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. The police
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88810 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       has not followed Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. while making the

                       seizure. It has also been submitted that the alleged quantum of

                       the contraband which is said to be recovered is though more

                       than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity.

                       Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial

                       custody since 14.10.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special

                       Judge, NDPS Act, Araria in connection with R.S. P.S. Case No.

                       189 of 2025.


                                                       (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.