Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Intekhab Alam @ Md. Intkhab @ Itkhab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that the seized codeine‑containing syrups do not constitute a narcotic drug under the NDPS Act and therefore granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Intekhab Alam, was arrested for possession of 150 bottles of cough syrups containing codeine, alleged to violate Sections 8, 21(c) and 22(c) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution argued that the seized quantity constituted a commercial amount of contraband, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Hira Singh v. Union of India. The defence contended that the codeine concentration (0.2%) was below the 2.5% threshold specified in Central Government Notification S.O. 826(E), and therefore the substances were not narcotic drugs under Section 2(d) of the NDPS Act; it also challenged the seizure procedure for lack of independent witnesses and non‑compliance with Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. Act. The court examined the statutory definition, the applicable notification, and the procedural deficiencies, and concluded that the substances did not fall within the definition of a narcotic drug. Consequently, the court granted bail to the petitioner on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether cough syrups containing codeine at 0.2% concentration are defined as narcotic drugs under the NDPS Act.
  • Whether the seizure complied with procedural requirements of Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. Act.
  • Whether bail should be denied on the ground of alleged commercial quantity of contraband.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • codeine concentration
  • commercial quantity
  • seizure procedure
  • Section 105
  • notification S.O. 826(E)
  • narcotic drug definition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88830 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2025 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Intekhab Alam @ Md. Intkhab @ Itkhab Alam S/o Md. Kamrujjama R/o
                 Village- Sakri Purani Bajar Ward No 3, PS- Sakari, District- Madhubani

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Sakri P.S. Case No. 198 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 8, 21(c) and 22(c) of the N.D.P.S.

                   Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution is that 100 bottles syrup

                   of Rexodex-T each of 100 ml containing codeine was recovered

                   and 50 bottles of zudik cough syrup containing codeine was also

                   recovered.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Petitioner is a licensee holder. Learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88830 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                            2/4




          petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the seizure list, it

          will transpire that the seizure witnesses are not independent

          witness rather they are police personnel. Police has also not

          followed the provision of Section 105 of B.N.S.S. while making

          seizure. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial

          custody since 20.10.2025.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the Central Government has issued Notification No. S.O.

          826(E) dated 14.11.1985 which is given hereunder:-

                                   “S.O. 826(E). - In exercise of the
                                   powers conferred by sub-clause (b) of
                                   clause (xi) of section 2 of the Narcotic
                                   Drugs and Psychotropic Substances
                                   Act, 1985 (61 of 1985), the Central
                                   Government           hereby       declares    the
                                   following narcotic substances                 and
                                   preparations         to     be    manufactured
                                   drugs, namely:-
                                   xxx
                                   35. Methyl morphine (commonly known
                                   as 'Codeine') and Ethyle morphine and
                                   their salts (including Dionine), all
                                   dilutions and preparations except those
                                   which are compounded with one or more
                                   other ingredients and containing not
                                   more than 100 milligrams of the drug
                                   per     dosage        unit,      and   with    a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88830 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                            3/4




                                   concentration of not more than 2.5% in
                                   undivided preparations and which have
                                   been       established      in   Therapeutic
                                   practice.
                                   xxx”
                       6. In this case, Rexodex-T cough Syrup and zudik

          cough syrup containing codeine phosphate and triprolidine

          hydrochloride have been recovered and the concentration of the

          codeine in these drugs is approximately 0.2% which is less than

          2.5% as provided in the above notification.

                       7. Learned APP appearing for the State has

          vehemently the application for bail and has submitted that in the

          case of Hira Singh and Anr. V. Union of India and Anr., the

          Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that entire non-toxic material

          which is mixed with the contraband will be considered as the

          contraband and as such, the quantity which has been recovered

          from the possession of the petitioner is commercial quantity.

                       8. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that in view of

          Section 2(d) of the N.D.P.S. Act, the drug itself is not narcotic

          drug then there is no jurisdictional basis for the case and the

          Court would not have a reason to go into the question of

          quantities. The Central Government has power to issue

          notification time to time.

                       9. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88830 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026
                                                         4/4




                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Principal Sessions Judge, Madhubani in connection with Sakri

                       P.S. Case No. 198 of 2025.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
lata/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.