Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, directing his release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Surendra Singh was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleged to have ordered and personally assaulted Renu Kumari with an iron rod, causing a fractured elbow. The petitioner contended that he was innocent, had no prior criminal record, and highlighted a discrepancy between the FIR, which described an elbow injury, and the medical report that recorded injuries on the head and right wrist. He had been in judicial custody since 9 August 2025 and sought regular bail. The State opposed the bail application, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the court found the inconsistency in the injury evidence and the petitioner’s lack of antecedents sufficient to grant regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the gravity of the offences alleged under the B.N.S. and the Arms Act.
  • Whether the discrepancy between the FIR description of injuries and the medical injury report raises reasonable doubt about the prosecution’s case.

Legislation cited

  • Arms Act — s. 27
  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 127(2), 3(5), 351(2), 351(3), 352

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • bail petition
  • assault
  • injury report discrepancy
  • Arms Act
  • B.N.S.
  • criminal antecedent
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88849 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Surendra Singh Son of Late Siyasharan Singh Resident of Village - Kahuara,
                 P.S. - Nardiganj, District - Nawada.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Man Mohan Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-01-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2),

                   127(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of

                   B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that this case in two

                   parts: in first part, the petitioner is the order giver and in

                   second part, he has assaulted with iron rod to Renu Kumari

                   who has received injury on elbow which has got fractured.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that injury report of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88849 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026
                                            2/3




          Renu Kumari has been annexed in this petition and from

          perusal of that injury report, it is clear that she has received

          two injuries: first is a swelling on the left side of head about

          1” x 1” caused by hard blunt substance second is swelling on

          right hand wrist joint about 2’’ x 1’’ caused by hard and blunt

          substance. Learned counsel has further submitted that as per

          FIR, the assault caused by the petitioner was on elbow and due

          to that assault, elbow of injured Renu Kumari was fractured

          but injury report shows that she has received injury on right

          hand wrist joint. The allegation and injury report do not

          correlate with each other. A statement has been made in para-3

          of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal

          antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody

          since 09.08.2025.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

          vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court

          is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

          Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 38 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88849 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                      Nawada.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.