Patna High Court
Sahdeo KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court permitted the withdrawal of the bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, three residents of Jabdaul village in West Champaran, filed a bail application in the High Court of Patna in criminal miscellaneous case No. 88850 of 2025. After hearing, the petitioners' counsel sought permission to withdraw the pending bail application and to file a fresh one. The Court, after considering the request, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the present bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The Court also directed the office to hand over a certified copy of the impugned order and the FIR to the petitioners' counsel.
Issues considered
- Whether a bail application can be withdrawn with the Court's permission and the petitioner be allowed to file a fresh application
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal of application
- criminal procedure
- high court
- petition
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88850 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-143 Year-2025 Thana- Kumarbagh District- West Champaran
======================================================
1. Sahdeo Kumar S/o Sri Dhruv Paswan Resident of village - Jabdaul, Dubey
Tola, P.S - Kumarbagh, District - West Champaran
2. Paras Kumar S/o Chandrika Paswan Resident of village - Jabdaul, Dubey
Tola, P.S - Kumarbagh, District - West Champaran
3. Jagat Paswan S/o Vishwanath Paswan Resident of village - Jabdaul, Dubey
Tola, P.S - Kumarbagh, District - West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s: Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 09-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, learned counsel for
the petitioners and Mrs. Rina Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present bail
application with liberty to file afresh.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the present bail application
stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Office is directed to handover the certified copy of
the impugned order as well as of the F.I.R to learned counsel for
the petitioners.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.