Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jubaida Khatoon and Ors.versusState Of Bihar and Anr

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The order dated 26‑11‑2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah is quashed and the matter is remitted for fresh consideration.

Summary

The petitioners (Jubaida Khatoon, Ladli Khatoon, Shekh Sujay, Shekh Sahab and Shekh Amjad Ali) filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 26‑11‑2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah, which had taken cognizance of offences against them despite a police final report clearing one accused. The High Court observed that the impugned order was a typed, non‑speaking order issued without any reasons, amounting to a cryptic order passed without application of mind. Accordingly, the Court held that such an order cannot be sustained. The application was allowed, the magistrate’s order was quashed with respect to petitioners 1, 2, 4 and 5, and the matter was remitted to the lower court for fresh consideration. The remitted proceedings must also address the petitioners’ objection that the offences are not maintainable before the Judicial Magistrate but should be tried before the Gram Kachahari.

Issues considered

  • Whether a judicial magistrate’s order taking cognizance of an offence without reasons is valid.
  • Whether the order can be quashed on the ground of being a non‑speaking, cryptic order.
  • Whether the offences alleged are maintainable before the Judicial Magistrate or before the Gram Kachahari.

Subjects

  • quashing of order
  • cognizance
  • non‑speaking order
  • criminal procedure
  • maintainability
  • Gram Kachahari
  • remand
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8889 of 2016
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2015 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Jubaida Khatoon W/o Shekh Sahab
           2.    Ladli Khatoon @ Sarwari Begam @ Ladli W/o Amjad Ali
           3.    Shekh Sujay @ Sheikh Sujayat S/o Late Shekh Ilakat
           4.    Shekh Sahab
           5.    Shekh Amjad Ali @ Shekh Amajad both sons of Shekh Sujay All resident of
                 village- Ramnagar Bankat, P.S.- Majhauliya, District- West Champaran,
                 Bettiah

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    State Of Bihar
           2.    Chandni Khatoon W/o Shekh Ekram, R/o Village- Ram Nagar Bankat Tola
                 Shekh Toli, P.S.- Majhauliya, Dist.- West Champaran Bettiah

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Madan Kumar App
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   06-01-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner

                   submits that petitioner no. 3 has died and therefore this

                   application may be permitted to be withdrawn on his behalf.

                                3. Permission is accorded and accordingly, this

                   application is dismissed as withdrawn on behalf of petitioner no.

                   3 and now this application is restricted to petitioner nos. 1, 2, 4

                   and 5.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8889 of 2016(5) dt.06-01-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. This application has been filed for quashing the

          order dated 26.11.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1 st

          Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in Tr. No. 3088 of 2015 arising

          out of Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 434 of 2015.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that, after investigation, the police had submitted final form with

          regard to the petitioner no. 2, but the Court below, differing with

          the final form has taken cognizance against petitioner no. 2 and

          rest of the accused persons after charge-sheet was submitted.

                       6. After perusal of the impugned order, it appears that

          the same has been passed without assigning any reasons and is

          in a typed format.

                       7. In the opinion of this Court, such a cryptic and non-

          speaking order which has been passed without application of

          mind cannot be sustained.

                       8. In view of the above, this application is allowed

          and the order dated 26.11.2015 passed by the Judicial

          Magistrate, 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in Tr. No. 3088

          of 2015 arising out of Majhauliya P.S. Case No. 434 of 2015 is

          hereby quashed with regard to the existing petitioners i.e.

          petitioner nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 and the matter is remitted back to

          the concerned Court for fresh consideration with regard to
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8889 of 2016(5) dt.06-01-2026
                                                      3/3




                    taking of cognizance.

                                 9. While considering the case of the petitioners, the

                    concerned Court below must consider the objection of the

                    petitioners/accused that this case is not maintainable for the

                    alleged offences in the Court below and the same is

                    maintainable before the Gram Kachahari.



                                                             (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.