Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Radhan @ Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The application for regular bail was allowed.

Summary

The petitioner, Radhan @ Ravi Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS Lakhaura Case No. 252/2025) alleged under Sections 69, 137(2), 96 of the B.N.S. and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. He claimed that the alleged victim had voluntarily eloped with him, asserted his innocence, and highlighted his clean antecedents. He had been in custody since 22‑08‑2025 and sought regular bail, undertaking to cooperate with the investigation. The State opposed the bail on the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the facts, granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, directing release subject to the conditions of the lower court.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused in a kidnapping case involving alleged POCSO offences
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of absconding or tampering with evidence
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedents and claim of elopement justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • POCSO Act
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • surety
  • elopement
  • innocence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88996 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHAURA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Radhan @ Ravi Kumar S/o- Biltu Baitha R/v- Majirwa Ps- Lakhaura Dist-
                 East Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    XX S/o- Late Jatan Ram R/v- Jagiraha Kamroul Ps- Lakhaura Dist- East
                 Champaran

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP
                 For the O.P. No. 2     :        Mr.Asif Kalim, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   24-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for O.P. No. 2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor

                   for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Lakhaura P.S. Case No. 252/2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 69, 137(2), 96 B.N.S. and Section 8

                   of POCSO Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is accused of

                   kidnapping the victim.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. Learned counsel further submits that victim has
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88996 of 2025(5) dt.24-03-2026
                                                          2/2




                        said that she had eloped with the petitioner. Petitioner has clean

                        antecedent and he is in custody since 22.08.2025. The petitioner

                        undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.

                                     5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                        for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                     6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                        case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

                                     7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be

                        released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

                        Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                        satisfaction of the learned 6th District & Additional Sessions

                        Judge- cum- Exclusive Special Judge, POCSO Act, East

                        Champaran, Motihari, Bihar /concerned Court below in

                        connection with Lakhaura P.S. Case No. 252 of 2025.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.