Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Sonu @ Md. MonuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Sonu, was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he and 10-12 others assembled in an orchard armed with firearms intending to commit dacoity, and that a loaded country-made pistol was recovered from his possession. The petitioner contended that the weapon was planted by the police and that all seizure witnesses were government officials, making tampering unlikely. He also highlighted his clean antecedent, the completion of the investigation, and his prolonged pre‑trial detention since 3 October 2025. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the petitioner’s clean record, the completed investigation, and the nature of the witnesses, the Court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted in a case involving alleged dacoity and possession of arms when the investigation is complete and the petitioner claims the evidence is fabricated.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • dacoity
  • arms act
  • fabricated evidence
  • investigation completed
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89073 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2025 Thana- Manikpur District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Sonu @ Md. Monu S/o- Md. Manzoor Alam @ Md. Manjur Alam
                 Resident of Village- Surajgarha Naya Tola PS- Surajgarha District- Lakhisarai

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s       :       Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State              :       Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                          Heard the parties.

                                  2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Manikpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) and 61(2) of the BNS

                   and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner’s

                   counsel are that, as per the allegation, 10–12 persons, including

                   the petitioner, assembled in an orchard allegedly armed with

                   firearms with an intention to commit dacoity, and from the

                   possession of the petitioner one loaded country-made pistol was

                   shown to have been recovered, but the said recovery was

                   planted and fabricated by police, in fact, the said weapon was

                   not recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner

                   but was allegedly recovered from a field. It is further submitted
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89073 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     that all the seizure witnesses are government officials, and there

                     is no chance of tampering with the witnesses or evidence if the

                     petitioner is released on bail at this stage, as     against him, the

                     investigation has already been completed. It is lastly submitted

                     that the petitioner bears no criminal antecedent and has been

                     languishing in jail since 03.10.2025.

                                  4. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

                     for bail of the petitioner.

                                  5. Considering the above submissions, the averments

                     made in this application, fair and clean antecedent of the

                     petitioner, completion of investigation against him and also

                     taking into account the fact that the witnesses of search and

                     seizure are official persons, this Court is inclined to release the

                     petitioner on bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above

                     be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/-

                     (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                     each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection

                     with Manikpur P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025.



                                               (Shailendra Singh, J)
maynaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.