Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89197 of 2024
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2024 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE - DEHRI-ON-SONE
                                                       District- Rohtas
                  ======================================================
                  Santosh Yadav S/O Late Vishnu Yadav R/O Village- Ganghar, P.S- Nokha,
                  Distt.- Rohtas.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
            2.    Dashrath Yadav S/O Gurucharan Yadav R/O Village- Baak, P.S- Akorhigola,
                  Dist.- Rohtas.

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.
                                                   Mr.Bhaskar Shankar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh
                  For the Complainant      :       Mr. Saket Gupta
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

14   24-02-2026                      Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                                     2.        The petitioner apprehends his arrest in

                    connection with Complaint Case No. 29 of 2024 registered for

                    the offence under Sections 323, 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                     3.   As per the prosecution case, the allegation

                    against the petitioner is of committing forgery with the

                    complainant in business and have cheated money from the

                    complainant. It is further alleged that when the complainant

                    asked the petitioner to return the money, he threatened him to

                    kill.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89197 of 2024(14) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/3




                          4. It has been submitted by the learned senior

          counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he

          has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that the

          petitioner, without accepting his guilt and liability, is ready to

          pay Rs. 6,10,000/- to the informant but the learned counsel for

          the opposite party no. 02 submits that the claim of the opposite

          party no. 02 is of Rs. 6,87,000/- and he has no instruction to

          accept the said amount and he opposes the application of the

          petitioner.

                          5. I have considered the submission of the parties.

                          6. Considering the totality of the circumstances,

          this application is allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of

          his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within

          four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

          Magistrate, 1st Class, Dehri-on-sone, Rohtas/concerned Court

          below in connection with Complaint Case No. 29 of 2024,

          subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the

          Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

                          8. As a condition of this order, the bail bonds of the
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89197 of 2024(14) dt.24-02-2026
                                                      3/3




                    petitioner shall only be accepted if he brings a demand draft of

                    Rs. 6,10,000/- at the time of furnishing his bail bonds in the

                    name of the opposite party no. 02 and the same shall be handed

                    over to the opposite party no. 02. It is made clear that if the

                    petitioner will not bring the demand draft, as mentioned above,

                    his bail bonds shall not be accepted.



                                                                  (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U