Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Beby Ravidas @ Beby DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Beby Ravidas and Vandana Devi, mother and sister of the alleged kidnapper Sanoj Ravidas, applied for anticipatory bail in a case where a 16‑year‑old girl was allegedly kidnapped for marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners aided the kidnapping under Section 96 of the BNSS, 2023. The victim’s statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the BNSS, 2023, indicated that she voluntarily went with Sanoj Ravidas and did not support the prosecution’s version. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated solely because of their familial relationship with the co‑accused. Considering the victim’s statement and the lack of direct involvement, the court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners in the kidnapping‑for‑marriage case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • kidnapping
  • forced marriage
  • false implication
  • family members
  • Criminal Procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89224 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2025 Thana- TETERHAT District- Lakhisarai
                 ======================================================
           1.     Beby Ravidas @ Beby Devi W/O Upendra Ravi Das Resident of village-
                  Thekhi, P.S.- Halsi, Dist.- Lakhisarai
           2.    Vandana Devi @ Vandani Kumari D/O Upendra Ravi Das Resident of
                 village- Thekhi, P.S.- Halsi, Dist.- Lakhisarai

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kumari Anupam, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, App.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                     1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                   2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail,

                   arises out of Tetarhaat Police Station Case No. 137 of 2025,

                   disclosing offences under Sections 96 of the BNS, 2023.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, on 02.06.2025, the

                   daughter of the informant had gone to the market but she did not

                   return and upon search, the informant came to know that co-

                   accused Sanoj Ravidas and petitioner enticed her daughter and

                   kidnapped her for marriage.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   age of the victim girl is about 16 years and odd and co-accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89224 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




          Sanoj Ravidas is also young. Both were having adolescent love

          and have performed marriage. The statement of the victim girl

          has been recorded under Section 180 and 183 of the BNSS,

          2023, in which she has not supported the prosecution story and

          has said that she was in love with co-accused Sanoj Ravidas and

          voluntarily went with her husband. Learned counsel further

          submits that the petitioners are mother and sister of Sanoj

          Ravidas and have falsely been implicated in this case merely

          because they happen to be the family members of the co-

          accused Sanoj Ravidas.

                          5. Having regard to the submissions made on

          behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the statement

          of the victim girl recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS,

          2023, as mentioned in the impugned order and the fact that the

          petitioners are the family members of the co-accused Sanoj

          Ravidas, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of

          anticipatory bail.

                          6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

          weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89224 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

                     Lakhisarai, in connection with Tetarhaat Police Station Case No.

                     137 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section

                     438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the

                     BNSS, 2023.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.