Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Baban RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000, two sureties, and specified conditions.

Summary

Baban Rai, who has been in custody since 12 November 2025, applied for bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act where 50 litres of country-made liquor were seized from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed he was unaware of the liquor and was falsely implicated, citing only a prior similar offence as the basis for his arrest. The State opposed bail, but the court considered the length of custody, the nature of the offence, and the petitioner’s willingness to furnish a bail bond and sureties. The court ordered bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions such as personal presence at trial, a close relative as a bailor, and provisions for cancellation if the petitioner absents himself or is found involved in similar offences. The bail order was granted subject to these terms, and the court clarified that any observations in the order would not affect the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act considering the nature of the offence and his prior criminal antecedent
  • Whether the petitioner’s custody since 12 November 2025 warrants continued detention or bail

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • criminal antecedent
  • surety
  • custody
  • excise offence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89322 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2025 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Baban Rai S/o Late Bali Rai R/o Vill- Puchhary, P.O. and P.S- Baniyapur,
                 Dist- Saran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Jeetendra Narayan, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Akbar Ali, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-01-2026                      Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection

                   with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 267 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, two persons were

                   apprehended with motorcycle and upon search, total 50 litres

                   country made liquor was recovered.

                                4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

                   It is further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the

                   seized liquor. It has further been submitted that the petitioner was

                   not aware of the content which was being carried on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89322 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                            2/3




          motorcycle along with the other co-accused. It has lastly been

          submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only

          because he has one criminal antecedent of similar nature and he is

          in custody since 12.11.2025.

                        5. The petitioner is willing and undertakes to deposit a

          sum of Rs. 5000/- with the Advocate Association, Patna High

          Court.

                        6. The learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                        7. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of

          the case and taking note of the fact that the petitioner has remained

          in custody since 12.11.2025, let the petitioner, above named, be

          released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

          thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is

          pending/successor court in connection Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 267

          of 2025, subject to the following terms and conditions :-

                        (i) One of the bailors shall be a close relative of the

          petitioner.

                        (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present before

          the concerned Court on each and every date of the trial and shall

          cooperate in the investigation.

                        (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89322 of 2025(2) dt.07-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner

                     will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned.

                                  (iv) If the petitioner, in future, is found to be involved

                     in similar nature of offence(s), the prosecution shall be at liberty to

                     move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                                  (v) The trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of

                     the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the

                     petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the trial court

                     shall take necessary steps for cancellation of bail bond of the

                     petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the

                     above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in

                     the name of verification.

                                  8. The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by

                     the learned Trial Court on showing receipt of deposit of aforesaid

                     amount with the Advocate Association, Patna High Court.

                                  9. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

                                  10. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in

                     this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                              (Sourendra Pandey, J)
Gautam/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.