Patna High Court
Baliram TiwariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The application was disposed of as withdrawn, with no opinion on the merits.
Summary
The petition filed by Baliram Tiwari in Criminal Miscellaneous No.89387 of 2025 sought to raise various points, including a specific ground, before the High Court at Patna. At the outset, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application so that the issues could be raised at a later appropriate stage. The Hon’ble Justice Praveen Kumar granted this permission, allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the application was disposed of as withdrawn, with the court expressly stating that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the underlying case. No substantive adjudication on the factual or legal issues was made.
Subjects
- procedural law
- withdrawal of application
- criminal miscellaneous
- court order
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89387 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-315 Year-2022 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan
======================================================
Baliram Tiwari S/O Bidya Tiwari Resident of Village- Rukandipur, Tola-
Dhanouta, P.S- Darounda, District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Bihar
2. Rahul Kumar Tiwari S/O Late Pradeep Tiwari R/O Village- Rukandipur,
Tola- Dhanouta, P.S- Darounda, Distt.- Siwan.
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amit Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 20-04-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset,
prays for withdrawal of this application so as to raise all the
points available to him including the ground raised in this
application at appropriate stage.
2. Permission is granted.
3. This application is disposed of as withdrawn with
the liberty aforesaid.
4. It is made clear that this court has not expressed
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Pawan/-
U T
Checking your session…