Patna High Court
Nitish Kumar @ Raj Nikhil @ Rajnish @ Nitish Kumar PaswanversusThe State Of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court modified the earlier order and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC.
Summary
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was initially granted regular bail for an FIR registered under bailable offences, but the charge sheet was later filed under Section 307 IPC, a non‑bailable offence. An anticipatory bail application was rejected, and the High Court had earlier ordered the petitioner to surrender within six weeks for regular bail. The petitioner sought modification of that order to obtain anticipatory bail, citing that co‑accused in a similar case had been granted anticipatory bail. The Court considered the change in charge, the precedent of Mahendra Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar, and the petitioner’s apprehension of arrest, and directed that if he surrenders within four weeks, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC. The modification application was therefore allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite the charge sheet being under Section 307 IPC.
- Whether the earlier order directing surrender for regular bail can be modified to grant anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 307
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- regular bail
- modification of order
- Section 307 IPC
- Section 438 CrPC
- bail bond
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89754 of 2025
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67431 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2022 Thana- KARAHGAR District- Rohtas
======================================================
Nitish Kumar @ Raj Nikhil @ Rajnish @ Nitish Kumar Paswan S/O Vijay
Paswan @ Vijay Ram Resident Of Village- Kauwakhoch, Ps- Kargahar, Dist.-
Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Patna
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shivjee Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 09-01-2026 This application has been filed for modification of the
order dated 23.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 67431 of 2025 by
which the the bail petition of the petitioner was disposed of with the
observation that the petitioner is directed to surrender within six
weeks before the Court below which shall disposed of his regular
bail petition in the light of the earlier order of co-ordinate Bench in
Mahendra Prasad Singh vs State of Bihar (2004) 3 PLJR 491.
2. The FIR was registered under bailable sections. The
petitioner was granted regular bail by the court below, but the charge
sheet was submitted under Section 307 of the IPC. The petitioner,
thereafter being apprehensive of his arrest, filed an application for
anticipatory bail, which was rejected by the court below.
3. This Court, vide order dated 23-09-2025, directed the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89754 of 2025(2) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
learned court below to dispose of the regular bail petition of the
petitioner if he surrenders, in the light of the order passed in light of
Mahendra Prasad Singh vs State of Bihar (2004) 3 PLJR 491.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that
other co-accused persons, on the exactly similar footing, have been
granted anticipatory bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 54232 of 2025.
5. Considering the above-mentioned facts and
circumstances, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or
surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be
released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-
(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram
in connection with Kargahar P.S. Case No. 95 of 2022, subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
6. Accordingly, the modification application is allowed to
the extent indicated above.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
kundan/-
U T
Checking your session…