Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dukhi YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing release on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

Dukhi Yadav was arrested in connection with a case registered under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, based on the allegation that co‑accused stored stolen bikes and mobiles at his house. The prosecution’s case relied on the confessional statements of the co‑accused, while no material was recovered from the petitioner’s premises. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had been in judicial custody since 3 October 2025, and that the evidence against him was insufficient. The State opposed bail, highlighting five prior criminal cases against the petitioner. After hearing both sides, the Court found the circumstances warranted bail and ordered the petitioner released on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the serious charges and prior criminal record
  • Whether a confessional statement of a co‑accused is sufficient to justify denial of bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • confession of co‑accused
  • prior convictions
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89800 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2025 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Dukhi Yadav S/o- Ram Briksh Yadav @ Rambrichh Yadav R/o village -
                 Kerwa, kerba , P.s- Saharghat , District - Madhubani

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin,                 learned APP for the

                   State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Singhwara P.S. Case No. 271 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 338, 336(3),

                   323, 111(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution in short is that co-accused

                   namely, Raja Kumar and Chhotu Kumar were apprehended with

                   stolen bikes, and they disclosed that since the house of this

                   petitioner is near Nepal, they used to keep the stolen bikes and

                   mobiles at the house of this petitioner.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89800 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                     offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                     counsel for the petitioner submits that the house of the petitioner

                     was raided and nothing was recovered from him. He also submits

                     that the petitioner has been made an accused in this case on the

                     basis of confessional statement of co-accused namely, Raja Kumar

                     and Chhotu but not of similar in nature. He further submits that the

                     petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.10.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of five cases.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.          The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                     of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VII,

                     Madhubani in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 271 of

                     2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.