Patna High Court
Bhajo Paswan @ Bajrangi Paswan @ Bajrang Paswan @ BajrangversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner on the condition of a bail bond and sureties.
Summary
The petitioner, Bhajo Paswan, sought regular bail in a case registered as Asthawan P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 80, 238(a) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the deceased Soni Kumari was subjected to dowry cruelty and was killed by her in‑laws, who then concealed her body. The petitioner, the deceased's brother‑in‑law, contended that he was innocent, had no involvement in the alleged murder, and that the primary accusation was against the husband, who is already in custody. He had been in judicial custody since 12‑08‑2025. After hearing both sides, the Court found no sufficient ground to deny bail and ordered the petitioner to be released on a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the dowry‑related murder allegations
- Whether the allegations against the petitioner are sufficient to justify denial of bail
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 238(a), 61(2), 80
Subjects
- regular bail
- dowry death
- cruelty
- Section 80 B.N.S.
- Section 238(a) B.N.S.
- Section 61(2) B.N.S.
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89884 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2025 Thana- ASHTHAWAN District- Nalanda
======================================================
Bhajo Paswan @ Bajrangi Paswan @ Bajrang Paswan @ Bajrang S/o Late
Batasa Paswan R/o Village - Chistipur, P.S - Asthawan, District - Nalanda
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabeen Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 17-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in
connection with Asthawan P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025 registered
for the offence punishable under Sections 80, 238(a) and 61(2)
(a) of the B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Soni
Kumari (deceased) was married with one Rukesh Paswan in the
year 2018. It is further alleged that she was subjected to cruelty
on account of non-fulfillment of dowry demand of motorcycle
and Two lakh rupees. It is further alleged that all the in-laws
have killed her and they concealed the dead body.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89884 of 2025(2) dt.17-01-2026
2/2
case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is brother-in-law of the deceased and he is separate in
mess and business from the husband of the deceased. It has
further been submitted that the main thrust of allegation is
against the husband who is already in custody. Learned counsel
for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in
judicial custody since 12.08.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties
of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Magistrate- 1st Class, Nalanda, Biharsharif in connection with
Asthawan P.S. Case No. 95 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.