Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aftab Ansari @ Aftab AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioners with conditions.

Summary

Petitioners Aftab Ansari and Shamshad Ansari, who are in custody for alleged murder under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, sought bail. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused recorded seven days after the incident, alleging the petitioners were conspirators, while no incriminating material was recovered from them and they were not named in the FIR. The petitioners contended that the lack of direct evidence, their clean antecedents, and the delayed confessional statement did not justify denial of bail. The court examined these submissions and, noting the absence of material possession and the petitioners’ clean record, granted bail subject to strict conditions regarding sureties, personal appearance, and verification of antecedents. The order also clarified that any observations made therein would not affect the trial.

Issues considered

  • The adequacy of a confessional statement recorded after seven days as a basis to deny bail.
  • Whether the absence of the petitioners' names in the FIR and lack of seized incriminating material warrant bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedents and the nature of the offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Arms Act justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement
  • arms act
  • murder
  • conspiracy
  • clean antecedent
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90276 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-708 Year-2025 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Aftab Ansari @ Aftab Alam, S/o- Md. Ashik Ansari Village- Parshurampur,
                  P.S.-Turkauliya, District- East Champaran Bihar
           2.    Shamshad Ansari @ Shamshad Alam @ Aman, S/o- Md. Ashik Ansari
                 Village- Parshurampur, P.S.-Turkauliya, District- East Champaran Bihar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate
                                                  Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                                  ORAL ORDER


3   11-02-2026                   Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, learned Senior counsel assisted

                   by Mr. Pranav Kumar, learned counsel, for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Petitioners, who are in custody, seek bail in

                   connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 708 of 2025 registered

                   for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of

                   the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms

                   Act, 1959.

                                 3. The prosecution case is to the effect that the

                   informant's husband was returning from a party. It is alleged that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90276 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            2/4




          all the FIR named accused persons intercepted him on his way

          and committed his murder by a firearm. It has been alleged that

          one Farzan Ansari was the conspirator who got her husband

          killed and it has been specifically alleged that it was the co-

          accused Katil Akhtar @ Sipahi, who had fired upon the husband

          of the informant.

                       4. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits

          that the petitioners were not named in the FIR and their name

          had surfaced on the confessional statement of one Abhinandan

          Kumar, whose statement was recorded after seven days of the

          occurrence. It has further been submitted that the said person

          has only stated that the petitioners were the conspirators of such

          crime. Learned Senior counsel has submitted that nothing has

          been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners

          and their name has been inserted as an afterthought and till date

          no incriminating articles have been recovered from their

          conscious possession. It has lastly been submitted that the

          petitioners carry clean antecedents and they are in custody since

          25.10.2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for bail and has stated that the husband of the

          informant was killed in a conspiracy by the petitioners along
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90276 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                            3/4




          with others.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submissions made by the

          parties, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned court below where the case is pending/successor court

          in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 708 of 2025, subject

          to the following conditions:-

                                       (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall
                          be their close relative and the other shall be local
                          resident.
                                       (ii) The petitioners shall remain physically
                          present in Court on each date of the trial.
                                       (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive
                          dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail
                          bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by
                          the court concerned.
                                       (iv) If the petitioners are found involved in
                          similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall
                          be at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bond.
                                       (v) The learned Court below shall verify the
                          criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any
                          stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed
                          their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take
                          step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners.
                          However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the
                          above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose
                          of or in the name of verification.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90276 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026
                                                          4/4




                                     7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

                                     8. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in

                        this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                                 (Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.