Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Happy Sahani @ Happy KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner with a bond of Rs.10,000 and specific conditions.

Summary

Happy Sahani was arrested on 25 September 2025 in connection with a police case alleging that he fired a firearm, though no one was injured. He contended that the FIR was fabricated and that he had not committed any offence. The State opposed bail, pointing to the direct allegation in the FIR and noting that the petitioner had two other pending cases, though he was on bail in those. The court examined the allegations, the lack of injury, and the petitioner's claim of falsity, and considered the State's objections. It granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions of cooperation with the trial, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence, and ordered verification of his criminal antecedents. The bail order was made without delay for verification purposes.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the allegations of firing a firearm and the existence of other pending cases.

Legislation cited

  • BNS, 2023 — s. 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 118(2), 126(2), 3(5), 351(3)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • firearm offence
  • false FIR
  • conditions of bail
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90306 of 2025
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2025 Thana- LAKHAURA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Happy Sahani @ Happy Kumar S/O Ashok Sahani R/O Village- Beltola, P.S-
                 Sugauli, Distt.- East Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-01-2026                    Heard Mr.Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat,                  learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   25.09.2025 in connection with Lakhaura P.S. Case No.114 of

                   2025, dated 25.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1),

                   351(3), 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

                                3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he fired by

                   his firearms but no one has received any injury.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

                   submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and

                   fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as

                   alleged in the FIR. Although there is general and omnibus
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90306 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                            2/3




          allegation against all the accused persons including the

          petitioner that they have assaulted to the informant and his wife

          and allegation against the petitioner is that he fired by his

          firearms. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there

          there is specific allegation of firing attributed against the

          petitioner but no one has received any injury and all the injury

          inflicted upon the injured person caused by other co-accused

          persons. The police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet

          against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since

          25.09.2025.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is direct

          allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and he carries two

          more cases other than the present one but fairly submits that the

          petitioner is on bail in both the cases, as mentioned in para-3 of

          the bail petition.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Motihari East

          Champaran in connection with Lakhaura P.S. Case No.114 of

          2025,with the following conditions:-
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90306 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026
                                                           3/3




                                      (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                         witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                         criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.