Patna High Court
Raj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL REJECTED
- Bench
- PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Holding
Bail was denied as the nature of the accusations and the victim's statement warranted the petitioner’s continued custody.
Summary
Petitioner Raj Kumar Sah was charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for alleged rape, assault, and related offences. The prosecution alleged that he entered the victim's house, threatened her with a knife, touched her private parts, and fled when the victim's mother intervened. The victim and her mother also complained of assault by the petitioner and others. The petitioner applied for bail, arguing apprehension of arrest. The court, after hearing counsel, considered the seriousness of the allegations and the victim's statement and rejected the bail application, ordering that the petitioner remain in custody.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in view of the nature of the offences alleged under the B.N.S.
- Whether the victim's statement and the seriousness of the accusations justify denial of bail
Legislation cited
- B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352, 76
Subjects
- bail
- rape
- assault
- criminal procedure
- sections of B.N.S.
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90413 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2025 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
======================================================
Raj Kumar Sah, Son of Sevak Sah, Resident of Village - Trilokwa, Ward No.-
01, Police Station - Kesariya, District - East Champaran (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for
the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 76,
303(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The prosecution case in brief is that when the
informant was alone at her house, in the meantime, her
neighbour Raj Kumar Sah (petitioner) suddenly came at her
house and tried to commit rape by threatening her showing
knife. He touched her private parts and tore her clothes and
when informant’s mother came then he fled away from the
house. Thereafter, the informant’s mother went to complain
about the occurrence where she was also assaulted by the
petitioner and other accused persons.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90413 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
2/2
4. Considering the nature of accusation and statement
of the victim, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
khushbu/-
U T
Checking your session…