Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Avon NishadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The bail application was rejected as no fresh ground was shown to merit reconsideration of the earlier order.

Summary

Avon Nishad, a resident of Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, filed a regular bail application in the Patna High Court after his earlier bail request was rejected on 20 January 2025. The petitioner argued for release pending trial, seeking fresh grounds for reconsideration. The court examined the application and noted that no new material or changed circumstances were presented since the earlier order. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey held that the absence of fresh grounds precluded any alteration of the prior decision. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed, and the petitioner remained in custody.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail at this stage of the proceedings
  • Whether any fresh ground exists to revisit the earlier bail order dated 20 January 2025

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • fresh ground
  • High Court
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • bail application rejection

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90423 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur
                                                        (Bhabua)
                 ======================================================
                 Avon Nishad S/o Ramkumar @ Ram Kumar Nishad R/o Village-
                 Mohanpurwa, PO- Sambharpur, PS- Bithur, Dist.- Kanpur, U.P.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Mritunjay Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Murli Dhar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   16-02-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. Earlier, the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner

                   was rejected vide order dated 20.01.2025 passed by this Court in

                   Cr. Misc. No. 49292 of 2024.

                                3. I do not see any fresh ground to reconsider my

                   earlier order dated 20.01.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49292 of

                   2024.

                                4. Accordingly, the bail application stands rejected.


                                        (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

Nirmal/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.