Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing the execution of a bail bond with two sureties.

Summary

Ankit Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 8(c), 17(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act, with the charge sheet filed under Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and cognizance taken under Section 311 of the same Act. The prosecution's case relied on contraband recovered from co‑accused Jai Prakash Kumar and a digital weighing machine from co‑accused Mukesh Kumar, with no material seized from the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that the only evidence against him was the confessional statement of a co‑accused. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the NDPS offences. After hearing both sides, the Court found the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner sufficient to grant bail, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties to the Special Judge‑II, Muzaffarpur.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in an NDPS case where the only evidence against him is the confessional statement of a co‑accused.
  • Whether the nature of the offences under Sections 8(c), 17(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act precludes the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • criminal procedure
  • confessional statement
  • co‑accused evidence
  • judicial custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90616 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2025 Thana- KAJI MUHAMMADPUR District-
                                                       Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Ankit Kumar, S/o Rajnarayan Ray, R/o vill - Chokta Dhkaich, P.S.- Krishna
                 Brahm, Distt.- Buxar
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Advocate
                                                 Mr. Adarsh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Kazimohammadpur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2025 registered

                   for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 17(c) and 21(c)

                   of the N.D.P.S. Act. Chargesheet has been submitted under

                   Section 111 of B.N.S. and Sections 8(c), 17(c) and 21(c) of

                   N.D.P.S. Act and cognizance has been taken under Section 311

                   of B.N.S. and Sections 17(c) and 21(c) of N.D.P.S. Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from

                   the possession of one Jai Prakash Kumar, contraband was

                   recovered and from the possession of one Mukesh Kumar, one

                   digital weighing machine was recovered.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90616 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                       committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                       case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. He was

                       neither apprehended rather his name was disclosed by the co-

                       accused Jai Prakash Kumar. It has also been submitted that save

                       and except the confessional statement of co-accused, there is

                       nothing against the petitioner. Petitioner is having no criminal

                       antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since

                       15.05.2025.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                       vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Exclusive Special Judge-II (NDPS Act), Muzaffarpur in

                       connection with Kazimohammadpur P.S. Case No. 140 of 2025.


                                                         (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.