Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Obid @ Md. ObaidversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Obid, was arrested in connection with a land dispute case (Waini PS Case No. 26 of 2025) alleging assault with deadly weapons and other offences under various sections of the BNS. The prosecution's case is based on the informant's statement that the petitioner and others attacked him and his family on 30 March 2025. The petitioner pleaded innocence, claiming false implication and asserting that he is a man of means unlikely to abscond or tamper with evidence, and offered to comply with any bail conditions. The State opposed regular bail, but the court noted that the petitioner had been in custody for over a year and that charges had already been framed. Considering these changed circumstances, the court granted bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and several conditions regarding court attendance and conduct. The bail order was pronounced on 3 April 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the offences and the length of pre‑trial detention
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of absconding or tampering with evidence

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352

Subjects

  • bail
  • pre‑trial detention
  • land dispute
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • BNS

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90680 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- VAINI District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Md. Obid @ Md. Obaid Son of Md. Basir Resident of Village- Chandauli,
                 P.S.- Waini, District- Samastipur

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Ranjan Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   03-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Waini

                   P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 (S. Tr. No. 753 of 2025), registered for

                   the offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 126(2),

                   109(1), 351(2), 352, 303(2), 3(5) of BNS.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the

                   informant stated in his fardbeyan that on 30.03.2025 at about

                   09:00 PM when he was at his home, the petitioner and others

                   came with deadly armed weapons and started construction over

                   the disputed land and on protest, they started abusing him and

                   assaulted by iron rod over his head. When other family members

                   came to rescue then they were also assaulted.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90680 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.

          There is land dispute between the parties. There is case and

          counter case. The petitioner is a man of means and there is no

          chance of his absconding and tampering with the evidence. He

          further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by the

          conditions which may be imposed by this Court.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

          prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has now

          remained in custody from 31.03.2025, which is more than one

          year and further considering the fact that charges have already

          been framed against all the accused persons on 07.01.2026, as per

          the report submitted by the District and Additional Sessions

          Judge, Samastipur, under these changed circumstances, I am

          inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named, is

          directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where

          the case is pending/successor court in connection with Waini P.S.

          Case No. 26 of 2025 (S. Tr. No. 753 of 2025), subject to the

          following conditions:-

                       (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90680 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     relative.

                                   (ⅱ) The petitioner shall remain physically present in

                     Court on each date of the trial.

                                  (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates

                     without substantial reason or in violation of the terms of the bail,

                     the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the

                     Court concerned.

                                  (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature

                     of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for

                     cancellation of his bail bond.

                                  (v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal

                     antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found

                     that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court

                     below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the

                     petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bond in terms of the

                     above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in

                     the name of verification.

                                  8. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.



                                              (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
kundan/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.