Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jatta SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to strict conditions.

Summary

Jatta Singh was arrested on 29 October 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged assault on the informant's uncle, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023. The petitioner claimed he had a clean antecedent, was falsely implicated, and that the dispute stemmed from a land conflict. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The court noted the petitioner’s clean record and the existence of a case‑counter‑case, and consequently ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions regarding cooperation, presence in court, and non‑tampering with evidence. The bail order also directed verification of any concealed criminal antecedent, with cancellation provisions if conditions are breached.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious charges under the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and the existence of a case‑counter‑case justify bail.
  • Whether conditions can be imposed to safeguard the trial process.

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • false FIR
  • land dispute
  • clean antecedent
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90764 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2025 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Jatta Singh Son of Kamal Singh @ Kamla Singh Resident of village - Dihari,
                 P.S.- Sandesh, District - Bhojpur.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-01-2026                        Heard Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   29.10.2025 in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 117 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 23.05.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115, 332(c), 109 and 352

                   of the BNS, 2023.

                               3.     According to prosecution case, all the accused

                   persons including this petitioner have assaulted to the

                   informant's uncle due to which he received injury.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90764 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026
                                            2/3




          F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed

          any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. There is case and counter

          case between the parties. There is allegation against the

          petitioner that he has assaulted to the informant's uncle, namely,

          Sajan Singh on his head by means of iron rod due to which he

          has received injury and the injury report of the injured person

          suggest that the injury is grievous in nature. He further submits

          that due to admitted land dispute the present occurrence has

          taken place. He further submits that the police after

          investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner.

          The petitioner is in custody since 29.10.2025.

                      5.    Learned       Additional       Public   Prosecutor   has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that the petitioner has clean antecedent and there is case and

          counter case between the parties, let the petitioner, above

          named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara in

          connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 117 of 2025, subject to

          the following conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90764 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.