Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000, two sureties, and specific conditions.

Summary

Sita Devi, the mother of a deceased son, was arrested on 2 August 2025 in connection with a murder and assault case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. The prosecution alleged that she and her husband assaulted their son and daughter‑in‑law and murdered the son, while the defence argued that the FIR was fabricated, the petitioner has a clean antecedent, and it is implausible for an elderly woman to have committed the alleged acts. The petitioner sought bail after being in custody for several months. The court examined the petitioner’s clean record, the length of custody, and the lack of substantive evidence, and decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, presence in court, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents. The bail order was issued with a directive that any violation of conditions could lead to cancellation.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner Sita Devi under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
  • Whether the petitioner’s clean antecedent and period of custody justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • murder
  • assault
  • false FIR
  • clean antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90778 of 2025
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2025 Thana- MANIHARI District- Katihar
                 ======================================================
                 Sita Devi W/O Jawahar Lal Uraon R/O Village- Jagwati (Golaghat), P.S-
                 Manihari, Distt.- Katihar.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-01-2026                     Heard Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, learned Additional

                   Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   02.08.2025 in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No. 202 of

                   2025, F.I.R. dated 01.08.2025 for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

                               3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along

                   with her husband assaulted their own son and daughter-in-

                   law(informant) and committed murder of their son.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has clean antecedent and she has falsely been

                   implicated in the present case. He further submits that the

                   allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90778 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

          He further submits that the petitioner is the mother of the

          deceased and on the basis of the information furnished by the

          wife of the deceased who happens to be daughter-in-law of the

          petitioner the present F.I.R has been instituted against the

          petitioner and her husband. He further submits that it is not

          possible that an old lady can assault her son who is young and in

          presence of his wife. He further submits that the police after

          investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner.

          The petitioner is in custody since 02.08.2025.

                      5.    Learned       Additional       Public   Prosecutor   has

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          that the petitioner has clean antecedent and period of custody, let

          the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District &

          Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar in connection with

          Manihari P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90778 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                      move for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed her

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.



                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Vanisha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.