Patna High Court
Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Regular bail was denied because the offence is grave, the petitioners were directly involved, and their self‑incriminatory statements indicated a high risk of tampering with evidence or influencing the trial.
Summary
The petitioners, Himanshu Kumar (alias Himanshu Singh) and Niraj Kumar Nayan (alias Bittu Kumar), were charged under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the brutal murder of a deceased person whose neck was cut. CCTV footage placed both accused at the scene and showed them purchasing the murder weapon, with the payment made by Niraj Kumar. Both accused gave self‑inculpatory statements describing the killing and have been in custody since 8 September 2025. The learned Single Judge considered the heinous nature of the offence, the direct participation of the petitioners, and their admissions. In view of these circumstances, the Court declined to grant regular bail. The order expressly states that the observations are prima facie and do not prejudice the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether regular bail can be granted to accused persons under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 when the offence is heinous, the accused are directly involved, and have made self‑incriminating statements.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 103(1)
Subjects
- regular bail
- Section 103
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- murder
- self‑incriminatory statement
- heinous offence
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91109 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District-
Begusarai
======================================================
Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Singh
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 9149 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-285 Year-2025 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District-
Begusarai
======================================================
Niraj Kumar Nayan @ Bittu Kumar
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 91109 of 2025)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivekanand Singh, Advocate
Mr. Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate
Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Ms. Mona Verma, Advocate
Mr. Chitranjan Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate
Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, Advocate
(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 9149 of 2026)
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP
For the Informant : Mr. Ms. Mona Verma, Advocate
Mr. Chitranjan Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Amit Prakash, Advocate
Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
4 30-03-2026 These cases arise out of the same P.S. Case i.e.,
Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 285 of 2025; therefore, they
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91109 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026
2/3
are being heard together and disposed of by a common order.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
(Himanshu Kumar @ Himanshu Singh), the learned Senior
Counsel for the petitioner (Niraj Kumar Nayan @ Bittu Kumar)
and learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for the
informant.
3. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with
Muffasil P.S. Case No. 285 of 2025 registered for the offence
under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
4. Unknown criminals had killed the deceased brutally
by cutting his neck. After the recovery of the dead body, the
police investigated the case. From the CCTV footage collected
by the Police, the involvement of the petitioners has come. Both
the petitioners were found purchasing the murder weapon from
a shop. The CCTV has recorded the presence of the petitioners.
5. The payment for purchasing the murder weapon has
been made by the petitioner Niraj Kumar Nayan @ Bittu Kumar.
Both the petitioners have given their self-inculpatory statement
and have described the brutal murder of the deceased. The
petitioners are in custody since 08.09.2025.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance,
the heinous nature of the offence, and the direct involvement of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91109 of 2025(4) dt.30-03-2026
3/3
the petitioners in the crime, this Court is not inclined to grant
regular bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, these applications for regular bail
stand rejected.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is
prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of
adjudication of the present bail applications. Such observations
shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case
and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any
manner.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.