Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shambu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was not granted as the offence involved a commercial quantity of heroin.

Summary

Shambu Chauhan was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 312 grams of heroin, a commercial quantity. The petitioner filed a bail application after being in custody since 22 September 2025. The court examined the nature and quantity of the narcotics recovered, noting that it constituted a commercial quantity. Considering the seriousness of the offence under the NDPS Act, the court declined to grant bail and dismissed the application. The order was limited to the bail application and did not prejudice the merits of the trial, which was directed to be expedited.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted to an accused charged with possession of a commercial quantity of heroin under Sections 8(c) and 21(c) of the NDPS Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • heroin
  • commercial quantity
  • criminal procedure
  • trial expeditious

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91129 of 2025
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2025 Thana- KRITYANAND NAGAR District-
                                                          Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Shambu Chauhan Son of Late Biku Chauhan Resident of village- Shanti
                 Nagar Ward no 9, P S -Dalkhola Dist -Uttar Dinajpur, West Bengal

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar bihar
           2.    Union of India throgh the Narcotics Control Bureau Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Jitendra Kumar Pandey
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   16-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                   2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Krityanand Nagar P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence under Section 8(c), 21(c) of the NDPS Act.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of

                   312 grams of Heroine from the petitioner.

                                   4. The petitioner is in custody since 22.09.2025

                   and from the FSL report, it is clear that the recovered narcotics

                   is Heroine.

                                   5. Considering the recovery of commercial quantity

                   of Heroine, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the

                   petitioner.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91129 of 2025(4) dt.16-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                                 6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

                                 7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                    herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

                                 8.    The trial of the petitioner is directed to be

                    expedited.



                                                                (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.