Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhaibhav Kumar Mishra @ Bhibhav Kumar @ Bibhav Kumar MishraversusThe Union of India through the Assistant Commissioner, Customs (Prev.) Division, Motihari

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhaibhav Kumar Mishra, sought regular bail in an NDNDPS case where 65 kg of ganja was seized from a vehicle registered in his name. He claimed the vehicle had been sold in 2013 to Kuraish Tiwari, but the registration was not updated, asserting his innocence. The Customs opposed bail, stating that the alleged buyer denied the petitioner's contention. The court considered the large quantity of drugs recovered and the ownership dispute, and found the circumstances insufficient to merit regular bail. Consequently, the bail application was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under the NDPS Act in view of the seizure of 65 kg of ganja and the disputed ownership of the vehicle.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug seizure
  • ownership dispute
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91189 of 2025
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2013 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP.
                                                 District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Bhaibhav Kumar Mishra @ Bhibhav Kumar @ Bibhav Kumar Mishra S/o
                 Madan Mishra R/o Village - Chapra Bahas, P.S - Sugauli, District - East
                 Champaran

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The Union of India through the Assistant Commissioner, Customs (Prev.)
                 Division, Motihari Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :    Mr.Rajesh Kumar Mishra
                 For the Opposite Party/s :    Mr.Dr. K.N. Singh (A.S.G.)
                 For the Customs          :    Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   26-03-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned counsel for the Customs.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   NDPS Case No. 30 of 2013 arising out of Special Case No. 18

                   of 2012-13 registered for the offence under Sections 20, 23 and

                   29 of the NDPS Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, 65 kg of Ganja was

                   recovered from a vehicle of which the petitioner is the registered

                   owner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.

                   Petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2025. He further submits
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91189 of 2025(5) dt.26-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                      that the vehicle was sold to one Kuraish Tiwari in the year 2013

                      but in the registration certificate, ownership was not got

                      changed.

                                   5. Per contra, learned counsel for the customs

                      vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that during

                      the investigation, Kuraish Tiwari has denied this contention of

                      the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the huge recovery from the vehicle

                      belonging to the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant

                      regular bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      rejected.



                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.