Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash Kumar @ PuttiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Vikash Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered under Sections 61(2), 109, 111 and 140 of the B.N.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, a step‑brother of an informant, had hired a contract killer for Rs. 8,00,000. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, that the only accused apprehended was Saurav Kumar, and that there was enmity between him and the informant. He argued that no weapon or incriminating material was recovered from him and that he had no prior criminal record, having been in judicial custody since 17‑09‑2025. The State opposed bail. After hearing both sides, the court found the petitioner's claim credible and ordered that he be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 61(2), 109, 111 and 140 of the B.N.S. in view of the alleged involvement in a contract killing and the evidence presented.

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 111, 140, 61(2)

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • contract killing
  • enforced sections
  • false allegations
  • step‑brother

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91379 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-646 Year-2025 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Kumar @ Putti, S/O Vijay Narayan Pandey, R/O Near New Hero
                 Honda Service Center, Rajendra Path, Pirmohani, P.S- Gandhi Maidan, Distt.-
                 Patna.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Pintu Kumar Patel, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 646 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 61(2), 109, 111 and 140 of

                   B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that certain

                   unknown miscreants have caught the informant. They were

                   armed with a weapon. When the informant raised alarm, one of

                   them was apprehended who was identified as Saurav Kumar.

                   Saurav Kumar has disclosed that this petitioner who is

                   stepbrother has arranged the contract killer at Rs. 8,00,000/-.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91379 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

          committed no offence. From perusal of the F.I.R. itself it is clear

          that only one person Saurav Kumar was apprehended and from

          his possession, only a mobile and bike was recovered whereas it

          is alleged that the miscreants were armed with weapon. It has

          further been submitted that the name of this petitioner has

          surfaced in the statement of the co-accused. It has also been

          submitted that there is enmity between the informant and the

          petitioner as he is stepbrother of the petitioner. No injury was

          sustained by the informant. It has also been submitted that this

          case has been filed after taking advice from advocate to

          implicate the petitioner with whom the informant is having

          enmity whereas no occurrence has taken place. Nothing has

          been recovered from the possession of this petitioner and the

          story of arranging the killers is all concocted. Petitioner is

          having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial

          custody since 17.09.2025.

                       5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

          vehemently opposed the application for bail.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91379 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                         3/3




                       petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                       of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                       Magistrate 1st Class XIV, Patna in connection with Kadamkuan

                       P.S. Case No.646 of 2025.


                                                      (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.