Patna High Court
Saroj Singh @ Saroj Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- REJECTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court denied bail to the petitioner.
Summary
Saroj Singh was arrested on 7 June 2025 in connection with FIR No. 113 of 2025 alleging possession of an AK‑47, magazines, cartridges, land documents and Panchayat stamps. The prosecution charged him under Sections 132, 109, 186, 317(5), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1‑A), 25(1‑B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging that the FIR was fabricated and that the investigation violated Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS and Rules 165(d)(e)(f) of the Bihar Police Manual. The State highlighted the recovery of the weapons and the petitioner’s twelve prior criminal antecedents and opposed bail. The High Court, after considering the seriousness of the offences, the evidence recovered and the procedural claims, declined to grant bail, refusing the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted in a case involving alleged possession of illegal firearms and related offences.
- Whether alleged non‑compliance with Sections 103 and 105 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita and Rules 165(d)(e)(f) of the Bihar Police Manual warrants bail.
- Impact of the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents on the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 25(1-A), 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27, 35
- Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 — s. 109, 132, 186, 317(5), 3(5)
Subjects
- bail
- illegal firearms
- arms possession
- procedural violation
- Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita
- Bihar Police Manual
- criminal antecedents
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91405 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2025 Thana- MOHIUDDIN NAGAR District-
Samastipur
======================================================
Saroj Singh @ Saroj Kumar Singh S/O Tripurari Singh R/O Ward No. 10,
Sultanpur, P.S.- Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhukar Anand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 03-04-2026 Heard Mr. Madhukar Anand, learned counsel for
the petitioner and Mr. Mohammed Arif, learned A.P.P. for the
State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
07.06.2025 in connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S. Case No.
113 of 2025, FIR dated 06.06.2025 registered for the offence
under Sections 132, 109, 186, 317(5), 3(5) of the Bharatiya
Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 25(1-A), 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27
and 35 of Arms Act.
3. According to the prosecution case, when the
informant on basis of secret information reached the place of
occurrence, she recovered AK-47 and 18 magazine from the
possession of the petitioner. It is also alleged that on further
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91405 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2026
2/3
search, from the house of the petitioner 4 empty cartridges,
documents relating to land and in a plastic box 15 stamps of
Sarpanch belonging to different Panchayats were also found.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been
implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation as
alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has
not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R and there is
non-compliance of Section 103 and 105 of BNSS and apart
from that Rule 165(d)(e) & (f) of Bihar Police Manual has not
been complied and the petitioner is rotting in judicial custody
since 07.06.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand,
on the basis of material available on record and case diary has
vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and
submits that STF has recovered AK-47, 18 magazine, 4 empty
cartridges, documents relating to land and in a plastic box 15
stamps of Sarpanch belonging to different Panchayats from the
possession of the petitioner and apart from that petitioner
carried 12 criminal antecedents other than the present one.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91405 of 2025(3) dt.03-04-2026
3/3
connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S. Case No. 113 of 2025
pending in the Court of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Shahpur Patory, Samastipur.
7. Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Suruchi/-
U T
Checking your session…