Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kanhaiya Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar Yadav, was in custody for an alleged robbery of a cash bag amounting to Rs.8,61,062, charged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution highlighted his multiple prior criminal antecedents, while the petitioner argued that the trial was at a nascent stage and he would not engage in further criminal activity. The court examined whether bail could be granted despite the seriousness of the offence and the accused's history. It decided to release the petitioner on bail, requiring a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and imposing strict conditions regarding court appearances, police attendance, non‑tampering with witnesses, and refraining from further offences. Failure to comply with any condition would lead to cancellation of the bail bond.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused charged with robbery under Section 392 IPC who has prior criminal antecedents and has been in custody since 22.12.2023.
  • Whether imposing conditions such as regular court and police attendance, non‑tampering with witnesses, and abstaining from further offences is sufficient to safeguard the trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • Section 392 IPC
  • Criminal Procedure
  • court conditions
  • witness tampering
  • prior criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91536 of 2025
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-572 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Kanhaiya Kumar Yadav Son of Late Balkrishna Yadav @ Late Bal Krishan
                 Yadav R/V - Pipra PS - Saur Bazar, (Patarghat OP), Dist - Saharsa.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-02-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with S.T.

                   Case No. 132 of 2024 arising out of Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.

                   572 of 2023 for the offence punishable under section 392 of the

                   Indian Penal Code lodged on 14.08.2023, by the informant, Raj

                   Kumar Paswan.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged

                   that he works as a cash collection agent in Radiant Cash

                   Management Service Ltd. and on the fateful day, after collection

                   Rs.08,61,062/- kept it in a bag was hanging in the handle of his

                   motorcycle and as he was moving towards Punjab National

                   Bank, the accused intercepted and fled away with the bag.

                   Accordingly, the F.I.R.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91536 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026
                                            2/3




          though he is in custody since 22.12.2023, the trial is at nascent

          stage, he shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall be

          diligently appearing in trial.

                       5. Learned APP has drawn attention of this Court to

          paragraph-03 to show that he has multiple criminal antecedent

          against his belt.

                       6. Allegation is there, he also has criminal antecedent,

          the fact remains that the trial has not taken its pace, he is in

          custody 22.12.2023, an undertaking has been given as recorded

          above, in that background, if however, he fails to abide by the

          undertaking, the prosecution shall take immediate steps for

          cancellation of bail bonds.

                       7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and

          Additional Sessions Judge-II, Saharsa, in connection with S.T.

          Case No. 132 of 2024 arising out of Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No.

          572 of 2023 subject to the following conditions:

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Driving License/Voter ID/Pan Card

          etc.) to show his bona fide;
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91536 of 2025(3) dt.13-02-2026
                                                         3/3




                                    (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

                       before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

                       dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

                       bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                                    (iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

                       police station every fortnight till conclusion of the trial to mark

                       his attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be

                       submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be

                       at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                                    (iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

                       promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,

                       failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                       cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                    (v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                       criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.