Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ruchi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The bail petition is dismissed; the accused are not entitled to bail at this stage.

Summary

Petitioners Ruchi Devi and Manoj Yadav were arrested in connection with the alleged murder of Mahika Kumari, accused of killing her by strangulation. The prosecution’s case is based on a telephone tip from the victim’s nephew and the discovery of the body wrapped in a quilt, with marks of strangulation. The petitioners sought bail, claiming false implication, inconsistencies between the First Information Report and the post‑mortem report, and a clean criminal record. The post‑mortem report, however, concluded that death resulted from asphyxia and shock due to hanging caused by a flexible ligature. Considering the seriousness of the offence and the medical findings, the High Court declined to grant bail and directed the trial court to expedite the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a murder case where the post‑mortem indicates death by hanging.
  • Whether the inconsistencies between the FIR and the post‑mortem report justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • murder
  • post‑mortem
  • hanging
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • high court
  • Gaya

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9154 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2025 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ruchi Devi W/o Manoj Yadav Resident of Village- Taitariye, P.O.-Malhari,
                  P.S.- Imamganj, District- Gaya
           2.    Manoj Yadav S/o Ramchandra Yadav Resident of Village- Taitariye, P.O.-
                 Malhari, P.S.- Imamganj, District- Gaya

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Ms. Eashita Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rajendra Singh Shastri, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   14-07-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                               2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with

                   Imamganj P.S. case No. 217 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   under Sections 103[302 IPC], 238[201 I.P.C], 61(2)[120B I.P.C]

                   and 3(5)[34 I.P.C] of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                               3. Prosecution case, in short, is that nephew of the

                   informant Avinash Kumar informed on telephone that on

                   11.07.2025 at about 8.00 PM his niece Mahika Kumari has been

                   killed by his father Manoj Yadav (petitioner No.2) and step

                   mother Ruchi Devi (Petitioner No.1) by strangulation at rented

                   room near DSP School. On receiving this information,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9154 of 2026(4) dt.14-07-2026
                                            2/3




          informant rushed to the house of petitioners and found none was

          present in the house. In the meanwhile, a Bolero vehicle came

          there in which informant found dead body of his niece wrapped

          in a quilt. The informant found marks of strangulation on her

          neck. The informant believed that petitioners killed Mahika

          Kumari by strangulation.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

          the petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case.

          She further submitted that there is deviation in the First

          Informant Report and that of Post-mortem report. According to

          her as per the Post-mortem report the cause of death is Asphyxia

          and shock due to hanging. Learned counsel for the petitioners

          submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made

          against the petitioners. It has further been submitted that the

          petitioners are in custody since 11.07.2025 and have clean

          criminal antecedent.

                      5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners and

          submitted that there is minor deviations in the F.I.R. and the

          Post-mortem report.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case and perusal of the case diary as well as Post-mortem
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9154 of 2026(4) dt.14-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     report, it appears that Post-mortem report indicates that cause of

                     death is Asphyxia and shock due to hanging, as per opinion of

                     the Doctor, the features were ante-mortem and dangerous to life

                     and caused by suspension of the body by flexible ligature

                     material which encircle the neck. Looking into the Post-mortem

                     report, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at

                     this stage.

                                   7. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of bail to the

                     petitioners is, hereby, rejected.

                                   8. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.



                                                  (Alok Kumar, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.