Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Abhishek MishraversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Abhishek Mishra, was arrested in connection with a robbery on 24‑11‑2025 where an informant was threatened with a firearm and his cash and documents were stolen. He is charged under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, has a clean antecedent, no contraband was recovered from him, and his name appears only in the co‑accused’s confessional statement. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the facts, granted regular bail on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties, subject to the petitioner’s cooperation in the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case involving offences under Section 309(6) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • regular bail
  • Arms Act
  • robbery
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9155 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-335 Year-2025 Thana- SINGHWARA District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Abhishek Mishra Son of Sunand Mishra Resident of Village- Lalpur
                 Singhwara, P.S.- Singhwara, Dist- Darbhanga

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Saurav Anand
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Ahmad Ali
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR
                 PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   26-02-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well

                   as learned APP for the State.

                                   2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail

                   in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No. 335 of 2025,

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of

                   the BNS and Section 27 of Arms Act.

                                   3. The prosecution case in brief is that on

                   24.11.2025, the informant Bhola Yadav was returning to his CSP

                   shop after withdrawing ₹3,50,000 from the bank. In the way,

                   three unknown criminals intercepted him, threatened him with

                   firearm, fired shots to create fear, and forcibly snatched his bag

                   containing cash and important documents, along with his

                   motorcycle key, before fleeing from the spot.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9155 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                                    4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has

                     submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been

                     implicated. He is a person of clean antecedent. Nothing was

                     recovered from his possession and his name has figured in

                     confessional statement of co-accused. Except that, there is

                     nothing against him. He is under custody since 02.12.2025.

                                   5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State

                     has opposed the prayer for bail.

                                    6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and

                     circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on

                     bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M-

                     VII, Darbhanga in connection with Singhwara P.S. Case No.

                     335 of 2025, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall

                     cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as

                     and when required by the court.


                                          (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

kundan/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.