Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Angad Ranjan @ Angad Kumar Ranjan @ Angat RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Bail was denied to petitioner No.1 but granted to petitioners Nos.2 and 3 subject to bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Summary

The petitioners Angad Ranjan, Dinesh Das and Ravindra Das sought pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) for alleged assault, outraging the modesty of the informant's sister‑in‑law and theft of Rs.50,000. The FIR alleged that all three accused participated in the assault, but the petitioners argued that the allegations against them were general and omnibus with no specific overt act. The State contended that there was a specific allegation against petitioner No.1 for outraging modesty. The Court rejected the bail application of petitioner No.1, deeming the accusation serious and the offence grave. However, it granted bail to petitioners Nos.2 and 3, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 each, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS, provided they surrender within eight weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether the seriousness of the allegation of outraging modesty justifies denial of pre‑arrest bail to petitioner No.1.
  • Whether general and omnibus allegations against petitioners Nos.2 and 3 are sufficient to deny bail.
  • Whether Section 482(2) of the BNSS applies to the grant of bail in this case.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • pre‑arrest bail
  • general allegation
  • omnibus allegation
  • Section 482
  • BNSS
  • criminal procedure
  • outraging modesty
  • theft

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91808 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-345 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada
               ======================================================
           1 . Angad Ranjan @ Angad Kumar Ranjan @ Angat Ranjan S/o Late Chandrika
                Das Resident of village- Gagan khurd, P.s- Rajauli, District -Nawada
           2.    Dinesh Das S/o Late Chandrika Das Resident of village- Gagan khurd, P.s-
                 Rajauli, District -Nawada
           3.    Ravindra Das S/o Late Chandrika Das Resident of village- Gagan khurd, P.s-
                 Rajauli, District -Nawada

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Umeshanand Pandit , APP
                 For informant            :       Mr. Birendra Kumar , Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-01-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   the State .

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 126 ( 2 ),

                   115 ( 2 ), 109, 352, 303 ( 2 ), 76 and 3 (5) of BNS.

                                3 . According to the FIR, informant alleged that all

                   the accused persons including these petitioners came at the

                   house of informant and started abusing and assaulting

                   informant and his family members. It is further alleged that

                   petitioner No. 1 outraged the modesty of sister-in -law of the

                   informant and other co- accused persons threatened informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91808 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026
                                            2/3




          and others with dire consequences and also snatched Rs.

          50,000/- from mother of informant.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that

          allegation is general and omnibus against these petitioners.

          No specific overt act is alleged against them. Injuries

          sustained by the injured are simple in nature .

                       5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail

          petition and submitted that there is specific allegation against

          petitioner No. 1 that he outraged the modesty of sister-in

          -law of informant.

                       6. Considering the seriousness and nature of

          accusation against petitioner No. 1 and gravity of offence ,

          the prayer for pre – arrest bail of petitioner No. 1 is rejected.

                        7. Considering the general and omnibus allegation

          against petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 and other circumstances of the

          case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks

          from today, let the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 , as named above ,

          be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten

          thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to

          the satisfaction of the learned CJM Nawada in connection

          with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 345 of 2025 , subject to the

          conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91808 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                      Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS) , 2023 .



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.