Patna High Court
Shabana KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The court permitted the withdrawal of the bail application, resulting in its dismissal as withdrawn.
Summary
In a criminal miscellaneous proceeding (No.91822 of 2025) before the Patna High Court, petitioner Shabana Khatoon filed a bail application. The petitioner, through counsel Murari Narain Chaudhary, sought the court’s permission to withdraw the bail application so that the matter could be pursued before the trial court. The State, represented by APP Shantanu Kumar, opposed the withdrawal. The court considered whether a bail application could be withdrawn at the petitioner’s request. Finding no legal impediment, the court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may withdraw a bail application pending before the High Court
Subjects
- bail
- withdrawal
- criminal procedure
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91822 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S BAGHA District- West
Champaran
======================================================
Shabana Khatoon Wife of Safadar Saifi @ Chhotu D/O Abdul Hakim Khan
@ Md. Abdul Hakim Khan, Resident of Mohalla - Ansari Tola, Ward no. 31,
Ps- Bagaha, Dist- West chamapran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Safadar Saifi @ Chhotu Son of Afasar Khan Resident of Mohalla -
Baswariya, Ps- Bettiah town, Dist- West Champaran Resident of Mohalla -
Mansa Tola, ps- Bettiah Muffasil, Dist- West Champaran
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
3 16-01-2026 Heard Mr. Murari Narain Chaudhary, learned counsel
for the petitioner and Mr. Shantanu Kumar, learned A.P.P. for
the State.
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application
with liberty to pursue the matter before the learned trial court, if
so desire.
3. Permission is granted.
4. Accordingly, the bail application stands dismissed
as withdrawn.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ranjeet/-
U T
Checking your session…