Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Shahpur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged involvement in transporting illicit liquor. Police intercepted three individuals on a bike; two were apprehended and identified the petitioner as the third who escaped. The petitioner argued that no contraband was found on him, he has no criminal antecedent, and his name was only mentioned based on the statements of the apprehended persons. The State opposed the bail, contending the petitioner’s alleged participation in the offence. After hearing both sides, the court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 30(a)
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91848 of 2025
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- SAHPUR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Dheeraj Kumar Son of Jay Kumar Yadav @ Jay Kumar Resident of Village-
                 Shahpur, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Bhojpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Dilip Kumar Tiwary, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been

                   filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with

                   Shahpur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025 instituted for the offence

                   under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that                 police had

                   information that three persons on bike were carrying illicit liquor.

                   When they were intercepted, two persons were apprehended and

                   they disclosed the name of this petitioner who allegedly managed

                   to escape.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91848 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      counsel has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the

                      possession of this petitioner. Recovery, if any, has been made from

                      the possession of apprehended persons. His name has come on the

                      basis of statement of apprehended persons. A statement has been

                      made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no

                      criminal antecedent.

                                   5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has

                      opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in

                      the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court

                      is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is

                      directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four

                      weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in

                      connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, he will be

                      enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                      ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge Court No.

                      II, Bhojpur at Ara subject to the conditions as laid down under

                      section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-
U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.