Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Balli Sahni @ Bali SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Balli Sahni applied for bail in a case (Sahiyara PS Case No. 170 of 2025) alleging his involvement in the death of an informant's father, charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution claimed the accused assaulted the deceased with a lathi, causing his death. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated, pointing out that the FIR was vague, the post‑mortem report showed no external injuries, and the cause of death was likely sudden cardiac arrest. The court, after hearing both sides, found the evidence insufficient to justify continued detention and ordered the petitioner to be released on bail with a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties. Additionally, the court directed the civil surgeon to take action against doctors for preparing illegible injury and post‑mortem reports.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a homicide case under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 given the lack of external injuries and questionable post‑mortem findings.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • homicide
  • lathi assault
  • post‑mortem report
  • medical report legibility
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • evidentiary insufficiency

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91945 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2025 Thana- SAHIYARA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Balli Sahni @ Bali Sahani S/o Late Saheb Sahni R/o village - Hanuman
                 Nagar, P.S. - Sahiyara, Dist. - Sitamarhi

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   29-01-2026                    Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, learned APP for the

                   State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 170 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S.,

                   2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that on

                   27.08.2025, the petitioner along with others were having scuffle

                   with Roshan Kumar the father of the informant has gone to

                   console the parties. It is alleged that the accused persons have

                   assaulted him with lathi-danda due to which he died.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91945 of 2025(2) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/3




          committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

          case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from

          perusal of the FIR, it is clear that the nature of the allegation is

          general and omnibus. He also submits that from perusal of the

          postmortem report, it transpires that the board conducting the

          autopsy on the body of the deceased has found no external

          injury on his body, and the board has also opined that, in our

          opinion, the cause of death may be due to sudden cardiac arrest.

          He also submits that though from the perusal of the order of the

          learned trial court, according to the statements of the victim, the

          deceased was given 100 lathi blows but there is no any mark of

          injury on the body of the deceased. This falsifies the statement

          of the witnesses given during the course of investigation. He

          further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the

          petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is

          languishing in judicial custody since 29.08.2025.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91945 of 2025(2) dt.29-01-2026
                                                       3/3




                     bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

                     of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

                     Magistrate, 1st Class, Sitamarhi/Competent Jurisdiction in

                     connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 170 of 2025.

                                  7. Before parting, I would like to note that time

                     and again, the doctors have been directed to write injury

                     reports and postmortem reports either in block letters or in

                     typed form. Despite the above directions, the doctors

                     continue to write injury reports and postmortem reports like

                     their prescriptions, which cannot be read by a common

                     person.

                                  8. The Civil Surgeon of Sitamarhi Hospital is,

                     therefore, directed to take necessary action against the

                     doctors who          conducted the autopsy and prepared the

                     postmortem report which is not legible.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.